首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Geology >Assessment of direct CPT and CPTU methods for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of single piles
【24h】

Assessment of direct CPT and CPTU methods for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of single piles

机译:评估直接CPT和CPTU方法预测单桩的极限承载力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Twelve methods to determine axial pile capacity directly based on cone penetration test (CPT) and piezocone penetration test (CPTU) data are presented, compared and evaluated. Analyses and evaluation were conducted on three types of piles of different size and length. All the tested piles have failed at the end of static load test. Both the CPT methods and the CPTU methods were used to estimate the load bearing capacities of the investigated piles (Q_p). The static load test was performed to determine the measured load bearing capacities (Q_m). The pile capacities determined through different methods were compared with the measured values obtained from the static load tests. Two criteria were selected as bases of evaluation: the best fit line for Q_p versus Q_m and the arithmetic mean and standard deviation for the ratio Q_p/Q_m. Results of the analyses showed that the best methods for determining pile capacity are the two CPTU methods. Furthermore, the CPTU method is simple, easy to apply, and not influenced by the subjective judgements of operating staff. Therefore, it is quite suitable for the application in pile engineering practice.
机译:提出,比较和评估了十二种直接根据锥孔渗透试验(CPT)和压电锥渗透试验(CPTU)数据确定轴向桩承载力的方法。对三种不同大小和长度的桩进行了分析和评估。在静载荷测试结束时,所有测试的桩都失败了。 CPT方法和CPTU方法都用于估计所研究桩的承载能力(Q_p)。进行静载荷测试以确定测得的承载能力(Q_m)。将通过不同方法确定的桩容量与通过静载荷测试获得的测量值进行比较。选择两个标准作为评估依据:Q_p与Q_m的最佳拟合线以及Q_p / Q_m之比的算术平均值和标准偏差。分析结果表明,确定桩容量的最佳方法是两种CPTU方法。此外,CPTU方法简便易行,不受操作人员主观判断的影响。因此,非常适合桩工程实践中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号