首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Geology >Digital model of corrected accumulated flow for peak discharge data acquisition and drainage system design
【24h】

Digital model of corrected accumulated flow for peak discharge data acquisition and drainage system design

机译:用于校正峰值流量数据采集和排水系统设计的校正累积流量数字模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The design of a drainage system for a roofing slate quarry was implemented by the enhancement of discharge peak estimation, and the uncertainty inevitably associated with the engineering model was reduced. The development of a topographical, geological, and vegetation cover database developed from a Geographical Information System (GIS) allowed for the definition of the drainage network for a hydraulic system, along with the calculation of the runoff coefficient. This is applied to the digital model of accumulated flow (DMF) as a weight correction coefficient, using a matrix-based model at 5 X 5 m resolution. The new digital model of corrected accumulated flow (DMCF) is the result of combining the thematic maps with the map of slope <3 percent, which was previously created from the slope model. It is demonstrated that this new model allows to apply the "Rational Method" on cartographic units defined by the GIS. The DMCF is compared with other traditional applications of the Rational Method based on the calculation of the discharge peak considering: (1) the drainage basin as a single watershed or (2) defining an average runoff coefficient in each sub-watershed. Both approaches have bigger discharge peaks than those obtained by the DMCF since the slope, lithology, and vegetation cover have average values, and the runoff coefficient is poorly defined, increasing the uncertainty in the discharge peak.
机译:通过增加排放峰值估算来实现屋面采石场排水系统的设计,并减少了不可避免的与工程模型相关的不确定性。通过地理信息系统(GIS)开发的地形,地质和植被覆盖数据库,可以定义液压系统的排水网络,并计算径流系数。使用分辨率为5 X 5 m的基于矩阵的模型,将其作为权重校正系数应用于累积流量(DMF)的数字模型。新的修正累积流量数字模型(DMCF)是将专题图与以前从斜率模型创建的坡度<3%的图相结合的结果。证明了这个新模型允许在GIS定义的制图单位上应用“比例法”。基于排放峰值的计算,将DMCF与Rational方法的其他传统应用进行了比较,其中考虑了:(1)流域为单个流域,或者(2)在每个子流域中定义了平均径流系数。两种方法都比DMCF获得更大的排放峰,因为坡度,岩性和植被覆盖度均为平均值,径流系数定义不清,增加了排放峰的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号