首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Evaluation of the effectiveness of an enzymatic cleaner and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant for chemothermal processing of flexible endoscopes in washer-disinfectors in accordance with prEN ISO 15 883.
【24h】

Evaluation of the effectiveness of an enzymatic cleaner and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant for chemothermal processing of flexible endoscopes in washer-disinfectors in accordance with prEN ISO 15 883.

机译:根据prEN ISO 15 883评估酶促清洁剂和戊二醛基消毒剂对清洗消毒器中的柔性内窥镜进行化学热处理的效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the cleaning process, the disinfection process, and a combination of the two in accordance with the new international standard, prEN ISO 15 883. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cleaning process consisted of a 1-min prerinse at 20 degrees C, followed by a 5-min cleaning step at 45 degrees C (with an enzymatic cleaner, 0.5 %), followed by a 1-min interim rinse from 45 degrees C to 55 degrees C. The disinfection process consisted of a 1-min prerinse at 20 degrees C, followed by a 5-min disinfection step at 55 degrees C (with a glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant, 1 %), followed by two final rinses of 1 min each at 55 degrees C. Transparent test pieces were contaminated with a mixture of blood and ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM, and were assessed for visible cleanliness and microbial load. RESULTS: Cleaning alone, disinfection alone, and the combination of the two always led to visible cleanliness of all test pieces. The cleaning process revealed a mean reduction factor of > or = 4.6 (n = 6); the disinfection process revealed a mean reduction factor of > or = 9.0 (n = 6), and the combination of the two was found to reduce the test organism in the WD440 by 9.0 +/- 0.2 log (10) steps (n = 12) and in the AdaptaScope by 9.3 +/- 0.4 log (10) steps (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the entire process was found to be very effective and compatible for reprocessing flexible endoscopes in washer-disinfectors. No visible residual blood was found, despite the use of glutaraldehyde in the disinfection phase. These findings once again emphasize the importance of effective cleaning for the overall results when reprocessing flexible endoscopes.
机译:背景和研究目的:这项研究根据新的国际标准prEN ISO 15 883评估了清洁过程,消毒过程以及两者的组合的有效性。材料与方法:清洁过程由1-在20摄氏度下进行3分钟的预漂洗,然后在45摄氏度下进行5分钟的清洁步骤(使用0.5%的酶促清洁剂),然后在45摄氏度至55摄氏度之间进行1分钟的中间漂洗。在20摄氏度下进行1分钟的预冲洗,然后在55摄氏度下进行5分钟的消毒步骤(使用1%的戊二醛基消毒剂),然后在55摄氏度下进行两次最终冲洗,每次1分钟。用血液和肠屎肠杆菌的混合物污染试件,并评估其可见清洁度和微生物负荷。结果:单独清洁,单独消毒,以及两者的结合始终导致所有试件的可见清洁度。清洁过程显示平均减少系数>或= 4.6(n = 6);消毒过程显示平均减少因子>或= 9.0(n = 6),并且发现两者的组合可将WD440中的测试生物减少9.0 +/- 0.2 log(10)个步骤(n = 12) )和AdaptaScope中的9.3 +/- 0.4 log(10)步(n = 5)。结论:总的来说,发现整个过程对于清洗消毒器中的柔性内窥镜的再处理非常有效且兼容。尽管在消毒阶段使用了戊二醛,但未发现可见的残留血液。这些发现再次强调了在对柔性内窥镜进行再处理时,有效清洁对于整个结果的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号