首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin du Cancer: Journal de l'Association Francaise pour l'Etude du Cancer >Sentinelnode invasion: Is it necessary to perform axillary lymph node dissection? Randomized trial SERC [Ganglion sentinelle envahi: Faut-il faire le curage ou pas? Essai randomisé SERC]
【24h】

Sentinelnode invasion: Is it necessary to perform axillary lymph node dissection? Randomized trial SERC [Ganglion sentinelle envahi: Faut-il faire le curage ou pas? Essai randomisé SERC]

机译:前哨淋巴结浸润:是否需要进行腋窝淋巴结清扫术? SERC随机试验[入侵前哨淋巴结:是否应该进行清洁?随机试验SERC]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contribution of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is questioned for positive sentinel node (SN), micro-metastasis and isolated tumor cells but also for macro-metastasis. The aim of this work is to precise why a prospective randomized trial is necessary and the design of this trial. Why? For positive SN, the scientific level evidence appears insufficient for validation of ALND omission as a new standard. Rational is presented with non-sentinel node involved rate and number of NSL involved at complementary ALND, axillary recurrence rate, disease free survival rate and adjuvant treatment decision impact. How? The proposed Sentinelle Envahi et Randomisation du Curage (SERC) trial will randomly assign to observation only or complementary ALND with positive SN. The aim is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of ALND omission versus ALND.
机译:腋淋巴结清扫术(ALND)的贡献受到质疑,包括阳性前哨淋巴结(SN),微小转移和孤立的肿瘤细胞,还有宏观转移。这项工作的目的是明确为什么需要进行前瞻性随机试验以及该试验的设计。为什么?对于阳性SN,科学水平的证据似乎不足以验证ALND的遗漏是否为新标准。提出了Rational的非前哨淋巴结转移率和在补充ALND处所涉及的NSL数目,腋窝复发率,无病生存率和辅助治疗决策的影响。怎么样?拟议的《 Sentinelle Envahi等随机化试验》(SERC)试验将随机分配为仅观察或补充性SN阳性的ALND。目的是证明ALND遗漏相对于ALND不逊色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号