首页> 外文期刊>In Practice >Comments on the dilemma in the October issue: 'Euthanasia in a no-kill shelter'
【24h】

Comments on the dilemma in the October issue: 'Euthanasia in a no-kill shelter'

机译:在十月号的困境中发表评论:“无杀害性庇护所中的欧亚大陆”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The dilemma in the October issue concerned a local shelter's changing policy on euthanasia. It had previously promoted itself as a no-kill organisation, a policy for which it received significant public support and funding. However, its board of trustees had recently begun pressing for healthy animals to be put down because of a lack of capacity (In Practice, October 2014, vol 36, pp 478-479). Vanessa Ashall advised that, while it wouldn't be unethical for the board to formally review the shelter's stance on euthanasia, it would be unacceptable for the institution to surreptitiously shift its practices, as this would end up deceiving the public. She suggested that the vet involved should ask the trustees to clarify the principles underpinning the non-destruction policy and how those relate to the shelter's new circumstances.
机译:10月问题的困境涉及当地庇护所改变安乐死政策。此前,它曾宣传自己是一个无杀灭性组织,并为此获得了大量公众支持和资金支持。然而,由于缺乏能力,其董事会最近开始敦促放下健康的动物(《实践》,2014年10月,第36卷,第478-479页)。 Vanessa Ashall表示,尽管董事会正式审查庇护所对安乐死的立场是不道德的,但该机构秘密改变其做法将是不可接受的,因为这最终会欺骗公众。她建议所涉兽医应要求受托人阐明无损政策的基础原则,以及这些原则与避难所的新情况之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号