首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >Experimentation at the interface of fluvial geomorphology, stream ecology and hydraulic engineering and the development of an effective, interdisciplinary river science
【24h】

Experimentation at the interface of fluvial geomorphology, stream ecology and hydraulic engineering and the development of an effective, interdisciplinary river science

机译:在河流地貌学,河流生态学和水利工程的交界处进行的实验以及有效的跨学科河流科学的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One ‘2020 vision’ for fluvial geomorphology is that it itsalongside stream ecology and hydraulic engineering as a keyelement of anintegrated, interdisciplinary river science. A challenge to this vision is that scientists from these three communitiesmay approach problems from different perspectives with different questions and have different methodological outlooks. Refininginterdisciplinary methodology is important in this context, but raises a number of issues for geomorphologists, ecologists andengineers alike. In particular, we believe that it is important that there is greater dialogue about the nature of mutually-valuedquestions and the adoption of mutually-acceptable methods. As a contribution to this dialogue we examine the benefits andchallenges of using physical experimentation in flume laboratories to ask interdisciplinary questions. Working in this arena presentsthe same challenges that experimental geomorphologists and engineers are familiar with (scaling up results, technical difficulties,realism) and some new ones including recognizing the importance of biological processes, identifying hydraulically meaningfulbiological groups, accommodating the singular behaviour of individuals and species, understanding biological as well as physical stimuli, and the husbandry and welfare of live organisms. These issues are illustrated using two examples from flume experiments designed (1) to understand how the movement behaviours of aquatic insects through the near-bed flow field of gravelly river beds may allow them to survive flood events, and (2) how an understanding of the way in which fish behaviours and swimming capability are affected by flow conditions around artificial structures can lead to the design of effective fish passages. In each case, an interdisciplinary approach has been of substantial mutual benefit and led to greater insights than discipline-specific work would have produced. Looking forward to 2020, several key challenges for experimentalists working on the interface of fluvial geomorphology, stream ecology and hydraulic engineering are identified. Copyright 2009 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
机译:河流地貌学的“ 2020远景”是它与河流生态学和水利工程学一起,是综合的跨学科河流科学的关键要素。该愿景的挑战在于,这三个社区的科学家可能会以不同的视角,不同的问题以及不同的方法论观点来解决问题。在这种情况下,完善跨学科的方法很重要,但对于地貌学家,生态学家和工程师而言,却提出了许多问题。特别是,我们认为,重要的是就相互重视的问题的性质和采用相互接受的方法进行更多对话。作为对此对话的贡献,我们研究了在水槽实验室进行物理实验来提出跨学科问题的好处和挑战。在这个领域中工作面临着与实验地貌学家和工程师相同的挑战(扩大结果,技术困难,现实主义),以及一些新挑战,包括认识到生物过程的重要性,识别具有水力意义的生物群,适应个体和物种的奇异行为,了解生物刺激和身体刺激以及对活生物体的饲养和福利。使用设计的水槽实验中的两个示例说明了这些问题:(1)了解水生昆虫在砾石河床近床流场中的运动行为如何使它们能够渡过洪水事件,以及(2)如何理解鱼的行为和游泳能力受人造结构周围的流动条件影响的方式可以导致设计有效的鱼道。在每种情况下,跨学科的方法都是互惠互利的,并且比特定学科的工作所能产生的见解更大。展望2020年,确定了在河流地貌学,河流生态学和水利工程之间进行交互的实验学家面临的几个主要挑战。版权所有2009 John Wiley Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号