首页> 外文期刊>Educational psychology review >Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research
【24h】

Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research

机译:笔记记录试验:笔记记录研究的法律应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article is about note taking, but it is not an exhaustive review of note-taking literature. Instead, it portrays the application of note-taking research to an unusual and important area of practice-the law. I was hired to serve as an expert witness on note taking in a legal case that hinged, in part, on the completeness and accuracy of handwritten meeting notes. Based on my own research and that of others, I rendered three opinions about handwritten notes: (a) They omit most of what is said, (b) they omit details, context, and essential qualifiers, and (c) they contain inaccuracies or vague statements. This article tells the story of how I came to investigate note taking, become an expert witness, and render those three opinions. It concludes with a call to investigate note taking in non-academic settings such as meetings and to uncover ways to boost and improve note-taking methods.
机译:本文是关于记笔记的内容,但并不是对记笔记文献的详尽综述。取而代之的是,它描绘了笔记研究在法律的一个不寻常且重要的领域中的应用。我受雇担任法律记录方面的专家证人,该法律案件部分取决于手写会议记录的完整性和准确性。根据我自己和其他人的研究,我对手写笔记提出了三种意见:(a)他们忽略了大部分所说的内容;(b)他们忽略了细节,上下文和基本限定词;(c)其中包含错误或含糊的陈述。本文讲述了我如何调查笔记,成为专家证人并提出这三种意见的故事。最后,他呼吁对非学术场合(例如会议)中的笔记进行调查,并探索增强和改进笔记方法的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号