...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecosystems >Quantifying and Exploring Strategic Regional Priorities for Managing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Given Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives
【24h】

Quantifying and Exploring Strategic Regional Priorities for Managing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Given Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives

机译:鉴于利益相关者的多重视角,量化和探索管理自然资本和生态系统服务的战略区域优先事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A ubiquitous problem for community-based regional environmental agencies is to set strategic management priorities among a myriad of issues and multiple stakeholder perspectives. Here, we quantify the strategic management priorities for natural capital and ecosystem services using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in a case study of the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board (the Board) region. A natural capital and ecosystem services framework was tailored to present decision-makers with a range of potential issues for strategic consideration as goal hierarchies in MCDA. Priorities were elicited from the Board and its four regionally based consultative groups using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and swing weights. Centered log ratio transformed weights were analyzed using multiple pairwise ANOVA comparisons (Dunnett's T3) and hierarchical cluster analysis. Substantial variation in priorities occurred between decision-makers. Nonetheless, analysis of priorities for assets and services robustly demonstrated that water was the highest priority, followed by land, then biota, with atmosphere the lowest priority. Decision-makers also considered that environmental management should not impact negatively on built or social capital. Few significant differences in priorities were found between decision-maker groups. However, clusters of manager types were found which represent distinct alternative management strategies, notably the prioritization of either intermediate or final ecosystem services. The results have implications for regional environmental decision-making and suggest that embracing variation in perspectives may be a better way forward for multistakeholder MCDA. The study operationalizes natural capital and ecosystem services by providing strategic priorities for targeting management and policy within the context of community-based, regional environmental management.
机译:以社区为基础的区域环境机构普遍存在的问题是,在众多问题和利益相关者的多种观点中设定战略管理优先级。在这里,我们在南澳大利亚默里-达令盆地自然资源管理委员会(理事会)区域的案例研究中,使用多标准决策分析(MCDA)量化了自然资本和生态系统服务的战略管理优先级。量身定制了自然资本和生态系统服务框架,以向决策者提供一系列潜在问题,以作为MCDA的目标层次结构进行战略考虑。董事会及其四个地区咨询小组使用层次分析法和变动权重确定了优先级。使用多个成对的方差分析比较(Dunnett's T3)和层次聚类分析来分析中心对数比转换后的权重。决策者之间在优先事项上存在很大差异。但是,对资产和服务优先级的分析有力地表明,水是最高优先级,其次是土地,然后是生物区系,大气是最低优先级。决策者还认为,环境管理不应对已建成或社会资本产生负面影响。决策者群体之间在优先次序上几乎没有显着差异。但是,发现管理者类型集群代表了不同的替代管理策略,尤其是中间生态系统服务或最终生态系统服务的优先级。研究结果对区域环境决策具有影响,并表明拥抱观点变化可能是多利益相关方MCDA的更好方法。该研究通过在基于社区的区域环境管理的背景下提供针对管理和政策的战略重点,从而实现了自然资本和生态系统服务的运营。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号