...
首页> 外文期刊>Echocardiography. >Quantitative myocardial contrast supine bicycle stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease
【24h】

Quantitative myocardial contrast supine bicycle stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease

机译:定量心肌对比仰卧式单车应力超声心动图检测冠状动脉疾病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: If compared with two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) improves detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) during pharmacological stress, but there is paucity of data regarding quantitative MCE performed during supine bicycle stress. Objectives: To determine the feasibility and accuracy of quantitative MCE and assess its incremental benefit over 2DE for detection of CAD during supine bicycle stress. Methods: Sixty-one consecutive patients (47 males, 14 females, mean age 57 ± 12 years) with suspected CAD, who were scheduled for coronary angiography, underwent 2DE and MCE supine bicycle stress. The diagnosis of obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) was based on inducible wall-motion and myocardial perfusion abnormalities. For quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis, A, β, and Aβ reserve were derived from myocardial contrast replenishment curves. Results: Quantitative coronary angiography revealed ≥50% stenosis in 41, ≥70% stenosis in 18, single vessel disease in 24, and multivessel disease in 17 patients. If compared with 2DE, quantitative MCE was more sensitive (71% vs. 93%; P < 0.05) and more accurate (74% vs. 89%; P < 0.05) to detect obstructive CAD. The sensitivity of 2DE and quantitative MCE was 61% and 91% (P < 0.05) in 50-69% stenosis, and 63% and 92% (P < 0.05) in single vessel disease. No difference in sensitivity between 2DE and quantitative MCE was found in subjects with ≥70% stenosis (83% vs. 94%, P = NS) and multivessel disease (82% vs. 94%, P = NS). Conclusions: Quantitative MCE enhances sensitivity and accuracy of supine bicycle stress 2DE for detection of obstructive CAD, and this incremental benefit is especially present in less severe disease.
机译:背景:如果与二维超声心动图(2DE)相比,定量心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)可以改善药理学应激过程中对冠心病(CAD)的检测,但是关于仰卧自行车应激过程中进行定量MCE的数据很少。目的:确定定量MCE的可行性和准确性,并评估其在卧式单车压力下检测CAD的效果优于2DE。方法:连续61例疑似CAD的患者(男47例,女14例,平均年龄57±12岁)被安排进行冠状动脉造影,接受2DE和MCE仰卧位自行车压力。诊断为阻塞性CAD(≥50%狭窄)是基于可诱导的壁运动和心肌灌注异常。对于定量心肌灌注分析,A,β和Aβ储备量是从心肌造影剂补充曲线得出的。结果:定量冠状动脉造影显示41例中≥50%的狭窄,18例中≥70%的狭窄,24例中的单支血管疾病和17例中的多支血管疾病。如果与2DE相比,定量MCE检测阻塞性CAD的敏感性更高(71%比93%; P <0.05),更准确(74%比89%; P <0.05)。在50-69%的狭窄中2DE和定量MCE的敏感性分别为61%和91%(P <0.05),在单支血管疾病中的敏感性为63%和92%(P <0.05)。在狭窄程度≥70%(83%vs. 94%,P = NS)和多支血管疾病(82%vs. 94%,P = NS)的受试者中,2DE和定量MCE的敏感性无差异。结论:定量MCE增强了仰卧位自行车压力2DE检测阻塞性CAD的敏感性和准确性,这种增量获益尤其适用于不太严重的疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号