...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Engineering >Generating the questions
【24h】

Generating the questions

机译:生成问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The government's energy review, unveiled after much leakage and pre-empting by the politicians, did not in the end actually decide anything much, though its analysis of the options was comprehensive. But if the message was slightly coded, nobody now seems to be in any doubt that, after the requisite flurry of green and white papers, a planning review or two and maybe some other advanced paperwork, the UK will start building nuclear power stations again in the not-too-distant future. Whether that building process can be made fast enough to ensure that there is no energy gap between the retirement of the present stations and the arrival of the new ones is uncertain. And that is one reason why the energy debate will put engineering back in the forefront of the nation's consciousness.
机译:政府的能源审查在政客们的大量泄密和先发制人之后公布,最终并没有做出任何决定,尽管它对各种选择的分析是全面的。但是,如果这个信息稍微编码一下,现在似乎没有人怀疑,在必要的绿皮书和白皮书、一两次规划审查以及其他一些高级文书工作之后,英国将在不久的将来再次开始建造核电站。这一建设过程是否能够足够快,以确保现有车站的退役和新车站的到来之间没有能源缺口,尚不确定。这就是为什么能源辩论将使工程学重新成为国家意识的最前沿的原因之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号