...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Modelling >Emergy analysis applied to the estimation of the recovery of costs for water services under the European Water Framework Directive
【24h】

Emergy analysis applied to the estimation of the recovery of costs for water services under the European Water Framework Directive

机译:能值分析用于根据欧洲水框架指令估算水服务成本的回收

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, the European Union's Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD) that is intended to foster protection of water resources is examined, focusing on the improvement of ecological and chemical quality of surface and groundwater. The WFD includes the concept of full cost recovery (FCR) in accordance with the Polluter-Pays Principle, as one of the tools of an adequate and sustainable water resource management system. The WFD defines three different costs associated with water: resource costs (RC), financial costs (FC), and environmental costs (ECs).The FCR of water is examined from a biophysical perspective using emergy evaluation to: (1) establish resource values of water from different sources, (2) establish the full economic costs associated with supplying water, and (3) the societal costs of water that is used incorrectly; from which the resource costs, financial costs, and environmental costs, respectively, can be computed. Financial costs are the costs associated with providing water including energy, materials, labor and infrastructure. The emergy based monetary values vary between 0.15 and 1.73?/m~3 depending on technology. The emergy based, global average resource value (from which resource costs can be computed) is derived from two aspects of water: its chemical potential and its geopotential. The chemical potential monetary value of different sources such as rain, groundwater, and surface water derived from global averages of emergy inputs varies from 0.03 to 0.18?/m~3, depending on source, and the geopotential values vary from 0.03 to 2.40?/m~3, depending on location in the watershed. The environmental costs of water were averaged for the county of Spain and were 1.42?/m~3.Time of year and spatial location within the watershed ultimately influence the resource costs (computed from emergy value of chemical potential and geopotential energy) of water. To demonstrate this spatial and temporal variability, a case study is presented using the Foix watershed in northeastern Spain. Throughout the year, the resource value of water varies from 0.21 to 3.17?/m~3, depending on location within the watershed. It is concluded that FCR would benefit from the evaluation of resource costs using spatially and temporally explicit emergy accounting.
机译:本文研究了旨在促进水资源保护的欧盟水框架指令2000/60 / EC(WFD),重点是改善地表水和地下水的生态和化学质量。 WFD包含符合污染者付费原则的全额成本回收(FCR)的概念,它是适当且可持续的水资源管理系统的工具之一。 WFD定义了与水相关的三种不同成本:资源成本(RC),财务成本(FC)和环境成本(ECs)。使用能值评估从生物物理角度检查水的FCR,以:(1)确定资源价值(2)确定与供水有关的全部经济成本,以及(3)错误使用水的社会成本;从中可以分别计算资源成本,财务成本和环境成本。财务成本是与供水相关的成本,包括能源,材料,劳动力和基础设施。基于能值的货币值在0.15和1.73?/ m〜3之间变化,具体取决于技术。基于能值的全球平均资源价值(可从中计算出资源成本)来自水的两个方面:其化学势和地势。根据能源输入的全球平均值得出的不同来源(如雨水,地下水和地表水)的化学势货币值在0.03至0.18?/ m〜3之间,具体取决于来源,而地势值在0.03至2.40?/之间。 m〜3,取决于分水岭的位置。西班牙县的水的环境成本平均为1.42?/ m〜3。分水岭的一年中的时间和空间位置最终会影响水的资源成本(根据化学势能和地势能的能值计算)。为了证明这种时空变异性,使用西班牙东北部的Foix分水岭进行了案例研究。全年,水的资源价值在0.21至3.17?/ m〜3之间,取决于流域内的位置。结论是,使用时空显式能值核算,FCR将受益于资源成本的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号