首页> 外文期刊>Ecological restoration >Cost-effectiveness of Different Revegetation Techniques for Slender Banksia
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of Different Revegetation Techniques for Slender Banksia

机译:苗条山龙眼不同植被技术的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For planning revegetation, an understanding of options available to optimize plant establishment, survival, and growth is important, but while there is much published information on revegetation techniques, there is little on costs and cost-effectiveness (Bullock et al. 2011). In this study, I examined the costs associated with two commonly-used revegetation techniques: broadcast direct seeding and manual planting of nursery-grown seedlings. Seeding is generally cheaper, but may take longer to establish cover. Seedling planting, while more expensive, has higher initial establishment success, and may produce canopy cover faster (Whisenant 1999).
机译:对于规划植被恢复,了解可用于优化植物的建立,存活和生长的选项非常重要,但是尽管有关植被恢复技术的已发布信息很多,但成本和成本效益却很少(Bullock等人,2011)。在这项研究中,我研究了与两种常用的再植被技术相关的成本:直播直接播种和苗圃育苗的人工种植。播种通常更便宜,但可能需要更长的时间才能覆盖。苗木种植虽然价格昂贵,但初期成功率较高,并且可能会更快地产生树冠覆盖(Whisenant 1999)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号