首页> 外文期刊>Ecological engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology >Long term outdoor operation of a tubular airlift pilot photobioreactor and a high rate algal pond as tertiary treatment of urban wastewater
【24h】

Long term outdoor operation of a tubular airlift pilot photobioreactor and a high rate algal pond as tertiary treatment of urban wastewater

机译:管状空运试点光生物反应器和高速率藻池的长期室外运行,作为城市废水的第三级处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

530 L high rate alga pond (HRAP) and 380 L airlift tubular photobioreactor (TPBR) were operated and compared in a urban wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), with the main purpose of removing nitrogen and phosphorous from the effluent of the WWTP while generating a valuable biomass. The photosynthetic activity in TPBR was during entire experiment higher than HRAP. The maximum areal productivity reached was 8.26 ± 1.43 and 21.76 ± 0.3 g SS m~(-2) d~(-1) for HRAP and TPBR respectively. Total nitrogen (TN) removal averaged 89.68±3.12 and 65.12±2.87% for TPBR and HRAP respectively, while for total phosphorus (TP)TPBR and HRAP averaged 86.71 ±0.61 and 58.78 ± 1.17% respectively. The lipid content showed no significant differences (p < 0.05) between HRAP and TPBR averaging 20.80 ± 0.22 wt%. The main operating disadvantage of TPBR versus HRAP was the sever biofouling which forced to stop the experiment. Under the same conditions of operation TPBR was more limited at low temperatures than HRAP, and HRAP was more light limited than TPBR.
机译:在城市废水处理厂(WWTP)中运行并比较了530 L高速率藻类池(HRAP)和380 L气举管式光生物反应器(TPBR),其主要目的是从WWTP废水中去除氮和磷,同时产生有价值的生物质。在整个实验过程中,TPBR中的光合作用活性高于HRAP。 HRAP和TPBR的最大面生产率分别为8.26±1.43和21.76±0.3 g SS m〜(-2)d〜(-1)。 TPBR和HRAP的总氮(TN)去除平均值分别为89.68±3.12和65.12±2.87%,而总磷(TP)TPBR和HRAP的平均去除率分别为86.71±0.61和58.78±1.17%。 HRAP和TPBR之间的脂质含量无显着差异(p <0.05),平均为20.80±0.22 wt%。 TPBR与HRAP相比的主要操作劣势是严重的生物污垢,迫使其停止实验。在相同的操作条件下,TPBR在低温下比HRAP受更严格的限制,而HRAP在光下受限于TPBR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号