首页> 外文期刊>Irrigation and Drainage >Using Remote Sensing to Estimate Evapotranspiration of Irrigated Crops Under Flood and Sprinkler Irrigation Systems
【24h】

Using Remote Sensing to Estimate Evapotranspiration of Irrigated Crops Under Flood and Sprinkler Irrigation Systems

机译:利用遥感估计洪水和喷灌系统下灌溉作物的蒸散量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objectives of this study are to: (i) estimate the actual evapotranspiration (ETa) of the different irrigated crops in the South Platte River Basin, Colorado, USA; (ii) compare the consumption use for the irrigated areas for 2001 and 2010; (iii) investigate the impact of irrigation system (flood/sprinkler) on the estimated ETa. The ReSET model, a surface energy balance remote sensing based model, is used in this study to estimate the ETa of the South Platte River Basin irrigated crops for 2001 and 2010. Landsat 5/7 satellite images, weather data, shape files of irrigated crops, and a digital elevation model (DEM) were acquired and processed for the study area. The results of this study show that the estimated ETa using the ReSET model showed a reduction of 7.1% from 2.51 x 10(9) m(3) in 2001 to 2.33 x 10(9) m(3) in 2010, mainly due to the reduction of the irrigated area from 2001 to 2010 by 6.6%. The estimated total ETa of crops irrigated with flood irrigation systems decreased from 66.1 to 54.6%, while the estimated total ETa of crops irrigated with sprinkler systems increased from 33.9 to 45.4%. For 2001, the average seasonal ETa of all crops for flood irrigation and sprinkler irrigation, respectively, were 665 and 712 mm, with a 7% greater ETa for sprinkler systems. The ReSET model ETa estimates have been validated in a previous study of lysimeter measurements. However, in this study and due to the unavailability of a lysimeter, the model ETa estimates were verified with the reference evapotranspiration (ETr) of the weather stations in the study area. The results of the t-test shows a p-value = 0.124, greater than 0.05, which indicates that the means of the ReSET ETa estimates and the ETr are not significantly different. Additionally, the results of the F-test shows a p-value = 0.674, greater than 0.05, which indicates that the two variances of the ReSET ETa estimates and the ETr are homogeneous. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:这项研究的目的是:(i)估算美国科罗拉多州南普拉特河盆地不同灌溉作物的实际蒸散量(ETa); (ii)比较2001年和2010年灌溉地区的消费用途; (iii)调查灌溉系统(洪水/洒水装置)对预计的排放量的影响。本研究使用ReSET模型(一种基于表面能平衡遥感的模型)来估算2001年和2010年南普拉特河流域灌溉作物的ETa。Landsat 5/7卫星图像,天气数据,灌溉作物的形状文件,并为研究区域获取并处理了数字高程模型(DEM)。这项研究的结果表明,使用ReSET模型估算的ETa显示从2001年的2.51 x 10(9)m(3)减少7.1%至2010年的2.33 x 10(9)m(3)。从2001年到2010年,灌溉面积减少了6.6%。估计使用洪水灌溉系统灌溉的农作物的总ETa从66.1降至54.6%,而使用洒水系统灌溉的农作物的估计的ETa从33.9%增加至45.4%。在2001年,所有农作物的平均季节性ETa分别为665和712 mm,其中洪水灌溉和喷头灌溉的喷洒系统的平均ETa分别高出7%。 ReSET模型的ETa估计值已在之前的溶渗仪测量研究中得到验证。但是,在这项研究中,由于无法使用溶渗仪,因此ETA模型的估计值已通过研究区域气象站的参考蒸散量(ETr)进行了验证。 t检验的结果显示p值= 0.124,大于0.05,这表明ReSET ETa估计值和ETr的均值没有显着差异。此外,F检验的结果显示p值= 0.674,大于0.05,这表明ReSET ETa估计值和ETr的两个方差是均匀的。版权所有(c)2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号