首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >Cultures of Fear: Technonationalism and the Postcolonial Responsibilities of STS
【24h】

Cultures of Fear: Technonationalism and the Postcolonial Responsibilities of STS

机译:恐惧文化:技术民族主义和STS的后殖民责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper is a slightly spruced-up version of a talk delivered at a roundtable cosponsored by the Society for the History of Technology and the History of Science Society at their annual conference in Cleveland. Asked to speak about the responsibilities and opportunities for historians of technology and science working on Asia, I tried to situate the question within contemporary South Asian realities. In the broadest terms, I lay out the widespread conflicts and displacements that had been engendered by the megatech projects undertaken in the name of development and mobilized through the apparatus of the special economic zones (SEZs). Within this context, I suggest that fear had become a valuable political resource through which opposition to the projects was crystallized. Often irrational and frequently obscurantist, these fears nonetheless managed to trip up the iniquitous developmental juggernaut. As local fears hybridized, borrowed from, and traveled beyond their initial spheres of articulation, they created an intricate ecology of fear within which postcolonial megatech projects had to survive. Actor network theory, I argue, is insufficiently sensitive to these lurking irrationalities that haunt postcolonial technonational developmentalism, and if scholars want to understand the history and sociology of these projects, they have to take these fears and their politics mobilization seriously.
机译:本文是由美国科技史学会和科学史学会在克利夫兰举行的年度会议共同主办的一次圆桌会议上的演讲的摘要。当被问及在亚洲工作的技术史学家的责任和机会时,我试图将这个问题放在当代南亚现实中。从最广泛的意义上讲,我阐述了以发展为名进行并通过经济特区(SEZ)进行动员的巨型技术项目所引起的广泛冲突和流离失所。在这种情况下,我建议,恐惧已成为一种宝贵的政治资源,通过它,人们对这些项目的反对得以具体化。这些恐惧常常是非理性的,并且常常是晦涩的主义者,尽管如此,他们还是成功地摆脱了邪恶的发展主宰。当当地的恐惧与最初的表达方式混杂,相互借鉴并传播时,他们创造了错综复杂的恐惧生态,在这种生态中,后殖民的巨型技术项目必须生存。我认为,演员网络理论对困扰后殖民技术民族发展主义的潜伏不合理性不够敏感,如果学者们想了解这些项目的历史和社会学,他们就必须认真对待这些恐惧和政治动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号