首页> 外文期刊>International wound journal. >Validation of a laser-assisted wound measurement device in a wound healing model
【24h】

Validation of a laser-assisted wound measurement device in a wound healing model

机译:激光辅助伤口测量装置在伤口愈合模型中的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the treatment and monitoring of a diabetic or chronic wound, accurate and repeatable measurement of the wound provides indispensable data for the patient's medical record. This study aims to measure the accuracy of the laser-assisted wound measurement (LAWM) device against traditional methods in the measurement of area, depth and volume. We measured four 'healing' wounds in a Play-Doh (R)-based model over five subsequent states ofwound healing progression in which the modelwas irregularly filled in to replicate the healing process. We evaluated the LAWM device against traditional methods including digital photograph assessment with National Institutes of Health ImageJ software, measurements of depth with a ruler and weight-to-volume assessment with dental paste. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-tests. We demonstrate that there are significantly different and nearly statistically significant differences between traditional ruler depth measurement and LAWM device measurement, but there are no statistically significant differences in area measurement. Volume measurements were found to be significantly different in two of the wounds. Rate of percentage change was analysed for volume and depth in the wound healing model, and the LAWM device was not significantly different than the traditional measurement technique. While occasionally inaccurate in its absolute measurement, the LAWM device is a useful tool in the clinician's arsenal as it reliably measures rate of percentage change in depth and volume and offers a potentially aseptic alternative to traditional measurement techniques.
机译:在糖尿病或慢性伤口的治疗和监测中,准确而可重复的伤口测量为患者的医疗记录提供了必不可少的数据。这项研究的目的是在面积,深度和体积的测量中,相对于传统方法来测量激光辅助伤口测量(LAWM)设备的准确性。我们在基于Play-Doh(R)的模型中测量了伤口愈合进展的五个后续状态中的四个“愈合”伤口,在该状态中,模型被不规则地填充以复制愈合过程。我们针对传统方法对LAWM设备进行了评估,包括使用国立卫生研究院ImageJ软件进行数字照片评估,使用直尺进行深度测量以及使用牙膏进行重量体积比评估。统计分析包括方差分析(ANOVA)和配对t检验。我们证明,传统标尺深度测量和LAWM设备测量之间存在显着差异,并且在统计上具有显着差异,但在面积测量上没有统计上显着差异。发现在两个伤口中的体积测量显着不同。分析了伤口愈合模型中体积和深度的百分比变化率,并且LAWM设备与传统测量技术并无显着差异。尽管在绝对测量中有时会不准确,但是LAWM设备在临床医生的军械库中是一个有用的工具,因为它可以可靠地测量深度和体积百分比变化率,并提供了替代传统测量技术的潜在无菌方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号