首页> 外文期刊>International wound journal. >A prospective, randomised study of a novel transforming methacrylate dressing compared with a silver-containing sodium carboxymethylcellulose dressing on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites in burn patients
【24h】

A prospective, randomised study of a novel transforming methacrylate dressing compared with a silver-containing sodium carboxymethylcellulose dressing on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites in burn patients

机译:对烧伤患者部分厚度皮肤移植供体位点上新型转化甲基丙烯酸酯敷料与含银的羧甲基纤维素钠敷料进行前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This prospective, randomised study compares a new transforming methacrylate dressing (TMD) with a silver-containing carboxymethylcellulose dressing (CMC-Ag) after application to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. This was an unblinded, non-inferiority, between-patient, comparison study that involved patients admitted to a single-centre burn unit who required two skin graft donor sites. Each patient's donor sites were covered immediately after surgery: one donor site with TMD and the other with CMC-Ag. The donor sites were evaluated until healing or until 24 days post-application, whichever came first. Study endpoints were time to healing, daily pain scores, number of dressing changes, patient comfort and physicians' and patients' willingness to use the dressings in the future. Nineteen patients had both the dressings applied. No statistically significant difference was noted in time to healing between the two dressings (142 days using TMD compared with 132 days using CMC-Ag). When pain scores were compared, TMD resulted in statistically significantly less pain at three different time periods (2-5 days, 6-10 days and 11-15 days; P < 0001 at all time periods). Patients also reported greater comfort with TMD (P < 0001). Users rated TMD as being less easy to use because of the time and technique required for application. Reductions in pain and increased patient comfort with the use of the TMD dressing, compared with CMC-Ag, were seen as clinical benefits as these are the major issues in donor site management.
机译:这项前瞻性,随机研究比较了新的转化甲基丙烯酸酯敷料(TMD)和含银的羧甲基纤维素敷料(CMC-Ag)在施用于裂厚皮肤移植物(STSG)供体部位后的情况。这是一项无盲,非自卑,患者之间的比较研究,涉及纳入单中心烧伤病房并需要两个皮肤移植供体部位的患者。手术后立即覆盖每个患者的供体部位:一个供体部位带有TMD,另一个供体部位带有CMC-Ag。评估供体部位直至愈合或施用后24天,以先到者为准。研究终点为康复时间,每日疼痛评分,换药次数,患者舒适度以及医生和患者将来使用敷料的意愿。 19名患者同时使用了两种敷料。两种敷料的愈合时间没有统计学上的显着差异(使用TMD的时间为142天,而使用CMC-Ag的时间为132天)。比较疼痛评分时,TMD在三个不同的时间段(2-5天,6-10天和11-15天;在所有时间段中P <0001)的疼痛明显减少。患者还表示对TMD的舒适度更高(P <0001)。由于应用所需的时间和技术,用户将TMD认为不太容易使用。与CMC-Ag相比,使用TMD敷料减轻疼痛和增加患者舒适度被视为具有临床益处,因为这些是供体部位管理的主要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号