首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up
【24h】

A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up

机译:压力性尿失禁妇女单切口与传统经闭孔中尿道吊带的随机比较:24个月随访结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction and hypothesis Midurethral sling procedures have become the principal surgical treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The 1-year results of this international trial comparing the efficacy and morbidity of a single-incision midurethral sling (SIMS; MiniArc) and a transobturator standard midurethral sling (SMUS; Monarc) showed that MiniArc is non-inferior regarding subjective cure and superior with regard to postoperative pain and recovery. The objective was to compare subjective and objective cure, morbidity and surgery-related discomfort following SIMS and transobturator SMUS up to a 24-month follow-up.
机译:简介和假设尿道吊带术已成为患有压力性尿失禁(SUI)的女性的主要外科治疗方法。这项国际试验的1年结果比较了单切口尿道中段吊带(SIMS; MiniArc)和经闭孔标准尿道中段吊带(SMUS; Monarc)的疗效和发病率,结果表明,MiniArc在主观治愈方面不逊色,在主动脉根治性方面优于关于术后疼痛和恢复。目的是比较SIMS和经闭孔SMUS术后24个月的主观和客观治愈,发病率和与手术相关的不适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号