...
首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >The multifilament polypropylene tape erosion trouble: tape structure vs surgical technique. Which one is the cause?
【24h】

The multifilament polypropylene tape erosion trouble: tape structure vs surgical technique. Which one is the cause?

机译:复丝聚丙烯胶带腐蚀问题:胶带结构与外科手术技术的比较。原因是哪一个?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study was designed to clarify whether the structure of multifilament tape or the surgical technique is associated with vaginal erosions. Patients were randomized into two groups: in group 1, formed from the patients who were operated with the technique "setting the tape loosely leaving a scissor tip gap between the tape and the urethra," and in group 2, formed from the patients who were operated with the technique "setting the tape actually touched the urethra and covering the tape by the adjacent pubocervicovaginal fascia with the aid of a suture." After 4-year follow-up, it was found that the erosion rate was very high in group 1 (13.6%). We conclude that the high erosion rate seen in multifilament tapes is associated with the surgical technique that is used, not the structure of the multifilament tape.
机译:这项研究旨在阐明复丝胶带的结构或外科手术技术是否与阴道糜烂有关。将患者随机分为两组:第1组,由使用“松散地固定胶布,在胶布和尿道之间留有剪刀尖的间隙”技术进行手术的患者组成;第2组,由采用以下技术的患者组成:手术的技术是“使胶带实际接触尿道,并在缝合的帮助下用邻近的耻骨阴道阴道筋膜覆盖胶带”。经过4年的随访,发现第1组的侵蚀率非常高(13.6%)。我们得出的结论是,在复丝带中看到的高腐蚀速率与所使用的外科手术技术有关,而不与复丝带的结构有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号