首页> 外文期刊>Building Engineer >CASE IN POINTS--RIGHTS TO LIGHT
【24h】

CASE IN POINTS--RIGHTS TO LIGHT

机译:以磅为单位-光的权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When I was first asked to write a review of this book, and before I even saw it, I started composing in my head what I would write because I needed to be clear in my own mind how I would approach the problem. After the first obvious criteria about fairness and objectivity, I concluded that I should start with my view of whether I would find the book of use to me personally. Unfortunately, as a person for whom right of light cases are the bulk of my work, having read it, I concluded it would not be of any great value compared with other literature on the subject albeit that I found a book with similar detail to be of use when I first started dealing with right of light matters 30 years ago. My first conclusion therefore is that this book is probably of little use to anyone who already deals with right of light matters but, to be fair to the RICS and the authors, I don't think they intended that such people would be their target readership anyway.
机译:当我第一次被要求写这本书的评论时,甚至在我还没有看到它的时候,我就开始思考要写什么,因为我需要自己清楚地知道如何解决这个问题。在关于公平性和客观性的第一个明显标准之后,我得出结论,我应该从我是否会亲自找到使用书的观点开始。不幸的是,作为一个轻量级案例是我工作的重中之重的人,阅读它后,我得出结论认为,与其他有关该主题的文献相比,这没有什么价值,尽管我发现一本细节类似的书30年前我刚开始处理光的权利时的用法。因此,我的第一个结论是,这本书对已经处理过轻质权利的任何人来说都没有什么用,但是为了对RICS和作者公平,我不认为他们打算让这类人成为他们的目标读者无论如何。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号