首页> 外文期刊>Bioethics >Expertise, wisdom and moral philosophers: A response to gesang
【24h】

Expertise, wisdom and moral philosophers: A response to gesang

机译:专长,智慧和道德哲学家:对格桑的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a recent issue of Bioethics, Bernard Gesang asks whether a moral philosopher possesses greater moral expertise than a non-philosopher, and his answer is a qualified yes, based not so much on his infallible access to the truth, but on the quality of his theoretically-informed moral justifications. I reject Gesang's claim that there is such a thing as moral expertise, although the moral philosopher may well make a valid contribution to the ethics committee as a concerned and educated citizen. I suggest that wisdom is a lot more interesting to examine than moral expertise. Again, however, moral philosophers have no monopoly on wisdom, and the study of philosophy may even impede its cultivation.
机译:在最近一期的《生物伦理学》中,伯纳德·格桑(Bernard Gesang)问道:一个道德哲学家是否比非哲学家拥有更多的道德专业知识,他的回答是合格的,不是基于他对真理的无懈可击的了解,而是基于他的品质。理论上有道理的道德辩护。我拒绝格桑关于道德专门知识的说法,尽管道德哲学家很可能会对作为关心和受过教育的公民的道德委员会做出有效的贡献。我认为智慧比道德专业知识更有趣。但是,道德哲学家再一次没有对智慧的垄断,对哲学的研究甚至可能阻碍其发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号