...
首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:机器人vs腹腔镜sa行阴道阴道脱垂术的治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic organ prolapse shows an increasing prevalence (3-50 %). The gold standard treatment for apical prolapse is sacrocolpopexy, which can be performed via minimal access (conventional laparoscopy or robotic surgery) or open sacrocolpopexy. The objective is to appraise the effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery compared with laparoscopic sacropexy in the treatment of apical prolapse.
机译:引言和假设盆腔器官脱垂的患病率呈上升趋势(3-50%)。根尖下垂的金标准治疗是sa小肠结肠切除术,可通过最少的入路(常规腹腔镜或机器人手术)或开放性sa小肠结肠切除术进行。目的是评估与腹腔镜手术在根尖脱垂治疗中相比,机器人手术的有效性和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号