首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Treatment of low-energy tibial shaft fractures: plaster cast compared with intramedullary nailing.
【24h】

Treatment of low-energy tibial shaft fractures: plaster cast compared with intramedullary nailing.

机译:低能量胫骨干骨折的治疗:石膏钉与髓内钉比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We analyzed data from 87 patients who had displaced closed or open grade I simple or spiral wedge tibial shaft fractures caused by low-energy impact. Fifty-four patients were treated with plaster cast and 33 with intramedullary locking nail (IMLN). Delayed union only occurred in 8 patients after plaster cast treatment. Forty-two patients in the IMLN group and one in the plaster cast group suffered from anterior knee pain. Final treatment outcome, healing time, hospitalization time and duration of sick leave were assessed on the basis of 25 matched pairs of patients. Mean healing time, hospitalization time and sick leave in the plaster cast and IMLN groups were 19 (SD 6.7) and 12 (SD 4.4) weeks (P<0.001); 8 (SD 4.8) and 7 (SD 2.7) days (P=0.686); and 195 (SD 81) and 106 (SD 31) days (P=0.001), respectively. No difference was found between plaster cast and IMLN groups when the outcome was evaluated using the criteria of Johner and Wruhs.
机译:我们分析了87例因低能量撞击导致闭合或开放I级单纯或螺旋形楔形胫骨干骨折移位的患者的数据。 54例患者用石膏石膏治疗,33例使用髓内锁钉(IMLN)治疗。石膏延迟治疗仅在8例患者中出现延迟愈合。 IMLN组中的42例患者和石膏模型组中的1例患有前膝痛。根据25对匹配的患者评估最终治疗结果,治愈时间,住院时间和病假时间。石膏石膏和IMLN组的平均治愈时间,住院时间和病假分别为19(SD 6.7)和12(SD 4.4)周(P <0.001); 8(SD 4.8)和7(SD 2.7)天(P = 0.686);分别为195(SD 81)天和106(SD 31)天(P = 0.001)。使用Johner和Wruhs的标准评估结局时,石膏模型组和IMLN组之间没有发现差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号