...
首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Comment on Liu et al.: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing unipolar with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral-neck fractures
【24h】

Comment on Liu et al.: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing unipolar with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral-neck fractures

机译:对Liu等人的评论:比较单极与双极半髋置换治疗股骨颈移位骨折的随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dear Editor, In a recent issue of International Orthopaedics published in August 2014, we read with great interest the article by Liu et al. [1] entitled "Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing unipolar with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral-neck fractures". The investigators performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in the literature to evaluate unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. It is a valuable study. Nevertheless, there are some queries that we would like to communicate with the authors.
机译:亲爱的编辑:在2014年8月出版的国际骨科学杂志上,我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Liu等的文章。 [1]题为“比较单极和双极半髋置换治疗股骨颈骨折的随机对照试验的荟萃分析”。研究者对文献中发表的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,以评估单极或双极半髋置换(HA)对老年患者股骨颈骨折的治疗作用。这是一项有价值的研究。尽管如此,我们还是想与作者交流一些疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号