...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Ventilation >Comparison of Wind-Driven Natural Ventilation for Different Windows in a Room with a Single Opening
【24h】

Comparison of Wind-Driven Natural Ventilation for Different Windows in a Room with a Single Opening

机译:单开房间中不同窗户的风自然通风比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to get more effective natural ventilation into a room with a single sided opening or large depth, two new window types have been developed in the laboratory. These are based on three new patent developments. The first window is defined as a dual level 'up-down folio' window which consists of two pairs of openable sashes with one pair placed directly above the other. The second is a multi-sash mid-pivoted window with vertical deflectors. The performance of these new window designs were compared with a conventional side-hung window and sliding window by installing them, in turn, into a single sided opening space of a test room. Both spot measurements and CFD analysis were undertaken. Wind-driven ventilation performance was analysed in each case for three wind speeds 1 m/s, 2 m/s and 3 m/s and five wind angles 0°, 22.5°, 45°, 67.5° and 90°. It was concluded that for the single sided test case, the two new window designs provided room air velocities that were more uniform and with higher mass flow rates that occurred for the two conventional window types. However, further substantial studies arc needed to improve these designs and popularise these new types of windows.
机译:为了使单侧开口或较大深度的房间获得更有效的自然通风,实验室已开发出两种新的窗户类型。这些基于三个新的专利开发。第一个窗口定义为双层“上下作品集”窗口,该窗口由两对可打开的窗扇组成,其中一对直接位于另一对之上。第二个是带有垂直偏转器的多扇中枢轴窗。通过将这些新窗户设计依次安装到测试室的单侧开口空间中,将它们与传统的侧挂式窗户和滑动式窗户的性能进行了比较。进行了现场测量和CFD分析。分别分析了三种风速分别为1 m / s,2 m / s和3 m / s以及5个风向角0°,22.5°,45°,67.5°和90°时的通风性能。结论是,对于单面测试用例,两种新的窗户设计提供了两种常规窗户类型所具有的更均匀的室内空气速度和更高的质量流率。然而,需要进一步的实质性研究来改进这些设计并普及这些新型的窗户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号