首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >Factors that influence case managers' resource allocation decisions in pediatric home care: an ethnographic study.
【24h】

Factors that influence case managers' resource allocation decisions in pediatric home care: an ethnographic study.

机译:影响病例管理员在儿科家庭护理中的资源分配决定的因素:人种学研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Case managers make decisions that directly affect the amount and type of services home care clients receive and subsequently affect the overall available health care resources of home care programs. A recent systematic review of the literature identified significant knowledge gaps with respect to resource allocation decision-making in home care. METHODS: Using Spradley's methodology, we designed an ethnographic study of a children's home care program in Western Canada. The sample included 11 case managers and program leaders. Data sources included interviews, card sorts, and participant observation over a 5-month period. Data analyses included open coding, domain, taxonomic, and componential analysis. RESULTS: One of the key findings was a taxonomy of factors that influence case manager resource allocation decisions. The factors were grouped into one of four main categories: system-related, home care program-related, family related, or client-related. Family related factors have not been previously reported as influencing case manager resource allocation decision-making and nor has the team's role been reported as an influencing factor. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study are examined in light of Daniels and Sabin's Accountability for Reasonableness framework, which may be useful for future knowledge development about micro-level resource allocation theory.
机译:背景:案例管理者做出的决定直接影响家庭护理客户接收的服务的数量和类型,并随后影响家庭护理计划的总体可用医疗资源。最近对文献进行系统的审查,发现在家庭护理中在资源分配决策方面存在重大知识空白。方法:我们采用Spradley的方法,对加拿大西部的儿童家庭护理计划进行了人种学研究。样本包括11名案件经理和项目负责人。数据来源包括5个月内的访谈,卡片分类和参与者观察。数据分析包括开放式编码,领域,分类和成分分析。结果:一项主要发现是对影响案件经理资源分配决定的因素进行分类。这些因素分为四个主要类别之一:与系统有关,与家庭护理计划有关,与家庭有关或与客户有关。以前尚未报告与家庭有关的因素影响案例管理者的资源分配决策,也没有报告团队的作用是影响因素。结论:本研究的结果是根据丹尼尔斯和萨宾的“合理性责任制”框架进行审查的,这可能对将来有关微观资源分配理论的知识开发很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号