首页> 外文期刊>International review of law and economics >To litigate or not to litigate? The impacts of third-party financing on litigation
【24h】

To litigate or not to litigate? The impacts of third-party financing on litigation

机译:去诉讼还是不去诉讼?第三方融资对诉讼的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we analyze three different ways to finance litigation, namely (i) self-finance by plaintiffs, (ii) contingent fees arrangements and (iii) third-party financing. We show how they impact the access to justice, and the decision to settle or to go to court, when claims can be meritorious or frivolous. Our results show that third-party financing does not always increase the access to justice for a plaintiff, and may even decrease the equilibrium settlement amount. It also increases the number of frivolous claims. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们分析了三种为诉讼提供资金的方式,即(i)原告的自负盈亏,(ii)或有费用安排和(iii)第三方融资。我们将说明当索赔可能是立功的或轻率的时,它们如何影响诉诸司法的机会以及和解或诉诸法院的决定。我们的结果表明,第三方融资并不总是会增加原告的诉诸司法的机会,甚至可能会减少均衡结算量。这也增加了轻率索赔的数量。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号