...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of law and economics >The comparative law and economics of pure economic loss
【24h】

The comparative law and economics of pure economic loss

机译:纯经济损失的比较法与经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Law and economics shows that a key factor in determining the optimal economic loss rule is found in the relationship between pure economic loss and social loss. Economic loss should be compensable in torts only to the extent that it corresponds to a socially relevant loss. In this paper we undertake a comparative evaluation of the economic loss rule to verify whether modern legal systems, although not formally adopting the economic criterion, define the exclusionary rule in light of efficiency considerations. The comparative analysis reveals that the substantive applications of the economic loss rule in European jurisdictions are consistent with the predicates of economic analysis.
机译:法律和经济学表明,确定最佳经济损失规则的关键因素是纯经济损失与社会损失之间的关系。经济损失应仅在侵权行为与社会相关损失相对应的范围内予以赔偿。在本文中,我们对经济损失规则进行了比较评估,以验证现代法律体系尽管未正式采用经济标准,但是否出于效率考虑而定义了排除规则。比较分析表明,经济损失规则在欧洲司法管辖区的实质性适用与经济分析的前提是一致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号