首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE NETHERLANDS V. NUHANOVIC & THE NETHERLANDS V. MUSTAFIC-MUJIC ET AL. (SUP. CT. NETH.)
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE NETHERLANDS V. NUHANOVIC & THE NETHERLANDS V. MUSTAFIC-MUJIC ET AL. (SUP. CT. NETH.)

机译:荷兰诉NUHANOVIC和荷兰诉MUSTAFIC-MUJIC ET AL的简介。 (CT。NETH。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Following the takeover of Srebrenica by Bosnian Serb forces on July 11, 1995, Rizo Mustafic and his family, as well as Hasan Nuhanovic's parents and brother, were sent away from the UN compound in Potocari, within the Srebrenica enclave, by the Dutch forces (Dutchbat) who were based there. Shortly thereafter, Bosnian Serb forces killed Rizo Mustafic, Ibro Nuhanovic, Nasiha Nuhanovic-Mehinagic, and Muhamed Nuhanovic. Mustafic's surviving wife and children, and Nuhanovic's other son (applicants) filed separate suits for incurred damages against the Netherlands, arguing that the Dutchbat acted wrongfully by sending their relatives away from the compound. On September 6, 2013, the Dutch Supreme Court issued its two judgments in the matter, holding that the Netherlands was responsible for the conduct of the Dutchbat and had acted wrongfully towards the applicants.
机译:在1995年7月11日波斯尼亚塞族部队接管斯雷布雷尼察之后,荷兰军队将里佐·穆斯塔菲奇及其家人,以及哈桑·努哈诺维奇的父母和兄弟从斯雷布雷尼察飞地内波托卡里的联合国大院送走了(荷兰蝙蝠侠)此后不久,波斯尼亚塞族部队杀害了里佐·穆斯塔菲奇,伊布罗·努哈诺维奇,纳西哈·努哈诺维奇·梅希纳吉奇和穆罕默德·努哈诺维奇。 Mustafic尚存的妻子和子女,以及Nuhanovic的另一个儿子(申请人)分别提起诉讼,要求对荷兰造成损害,理由是Dutchbat的行为不当,是将其亲属从大院中带走。 2013年9月6日,荷兰最高法院就此事发布了两项判决,裁定荷兰应对荷兰蝙蝠的行为负责,并对申请人采取了不当行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号