首页> 外文期刊>International medical journal: IMJ >Comparison of Thoracotomy and Methods without Thoracotomy in the Dissection of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
【24h】

Comparison of Thoracotomy and Methods without Thoracotomy in the Dissection of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

机译:食管癌患者纵隔淋巴结清扫术中开胸与不开胸方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: In this study comparison of thoracotomy and methods without thoracotomy methods in the dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with esophageal cancer was performed.Methods: 24 cases who were operated for esophageal cancer between March 2006-November 2011 were retrospectively examined from the hospital records. Number of thoracic lymph nodes in the pathological specimens were compared between the groups. Mann-Whitney-U test and Fisher's chi-square test were used in statistical analysis. Statistical significance was accepted as P< 0.05.Results: 9 cases were female and 15 cases were male. Average was 57.58 ± 12.04 (minimum 36-maximum 78). The tumors were located in the cervical region in 2 cases, middle thoracic region in 8 cases and in distal esophagus in 14 cases. The cases were diagnosed to be epidermoid carcinoma (n:15), adenocarcinoma (n:7) and mesencyhmal tumor (n:2). 12 cases underwent right thoracotomy + laparotomy + cervical incision, 2 cases underwent left thoracotomy + laparotomy, 4 cases underwent right thoracotomy+laparotomy and 6 cases were operated with the transhiatal technique. According to the pathology reports average mediastinal lymph node number in cases with thoracotomy was 14.11 ± 5.08 (minimum 6, maximum 22). The number of lymph nodes in the transhiatal approach without thoracotomy was 2.33 ± 1.03 (minimum 1, maximum 4). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in average age (P = 0.721) and gender (P = 1.000). The number of lymph nodes dissected with thoracotomy was significantly higher than the methods without thoracotomy (P = 0.000).Conclusion: The number of lymph nodes are important in esophageal cancer staging. Thoraccic approach is more suitable for staging than the transhiatal approach.
机译:目的:比较本院食管癌纵隔淋巴结清扫术与无开胸术的方法。方法:回顾性分析2006年3月至2011年11月间24例食管癌手术患者的临床资料。记录。比较两组病理标本中胸腔淋巴结的数目。统计分析采用了Mann-Whitney-U检验和Fisher的卡方检验。统计学意义为P <0.05。结果:女性9例,男性15例。平均值为57.58±12.04(最低36-最高78)。肿瘤位于颈段2例,胸中段8例,食管远端14例。这些病例被诊断为表皮样癌(n:15),腺癌(n:7)和间皮瘤(n:2)。右胸开腹+开腹+颈切口12例,左开胸+开腹2例,右开胸+腹腔镜开腹4例,经腹膜穿刺术6例。根据病理报告,开胸手术的平均纵隔淋巴结数目为14.11±5.08(最少6个,最多22个)。不经开胸的经食管入路的淋巴结数目为2.33±1.03(最小1,最大4)。两组的平均年龄(P = 0.721)和性别(P = 1.000)之间无统计学差异。开胸切除的淋巴结数目明显高于未开胸的方法(P = 0.000)。结论:淋巴结数目在食管癌分期中很重要。胸腔入路比经口入路更适合分期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号