首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: YASSIN ABDULLAH KADI V. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: YASSIN ABDULLAH KADI V. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

机译:欧洲共同体一审法院序言:YASSIN ABDULLAH KADI V.欧洲共同体理事会和欧洲共同体委员会

获取原文
       

摘要

The decision of the Court of First Instance (CFI) of the European Communities (EC) in the Kadi Case has been long awaited. The challenge to the European legislation implementing the Taliban and Al-Qaeda sanctions of the UN Security Council had been raised already almost four years ago. The present decision addresses a host of highly topical issues that have arisen since the beginning of the so-called sanctions decade in the 1990s and that have become even more acute with the increased resort to targeted or "smart" sanctions. These issues range from the relationship between UN and EU/EC law to the scope of legislative powers enjoyed by the European Union (EU) and EC institutions; they relate to the extent to which the UN and the EU/EC are bound by general international law, in particular by human rights norms, and to the question of who may determine such obligations; they concern the identification and effect of jus cogens norms; and they cover the specific scope of individual rights such as the right to property, the right to be heard and the right of access to court. The case is one of a series of actions brought before the CFI as annulment actions directed against various EC regulations implementing UN Security Council-imposed sanctions in the form of asset freezing orders against individuals suspected of involvement in Taliban and Al-Qaeda terrorist activities. The applicant, whose assets had been frozen as a result of the Community legislation, challenged the legality of such action arguing that it infringed upon his right to property, his right to a fair hearing and his right to seek judicial review.
机译:期待已久的是欧洲共同体(EC)一审法院(CFI)关于Kadi案的裁决。对欧洲立法实施联合国安理会塔利班和基地组织制裁的挑战已经提出了将近四年前。本决定解决了自1990年代所谓制裁十年开始以来出现的一系列高度关注的问题,随着对目标制裁或“智能”制裁的日益增加,这一问题变得更加尖锐。这些问题的范围从联合国和欧盟/欧共体法律之间的关系到欧盟和欧共体机构享有的立法权范围;它们涉及联合国和欧盟/欧共体在多大程度上受一般国际法,特别是人权准则的约束,以及由谁来确定此类义务的问题;它们涉及强制法规范的确定和效力;它们涵盖了个人权利的特定范围,例如财产权,陈述权和诉诸法院的权利。该案是CFI采取的一系列行动之一,作为针对欧共体各项法规的废除行动,这些法规以涉嫌参与塔利班和基地组织恐怖活动的个人资产冻结令的形式实施了联合国安理会实施的制裁。由于共同体立法而冻结了其资产的申请人对这种行为的合法性提出了质疑,认为它侵犯了他的财产权,公正的听证权和寻求司法审查的权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号