首页> 外文期刊>International journal of STD & AIDS >Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: national survey of genitourinary medicine clinics.
【24h】

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: national survey of genitourinary medicine clinics.

机译:慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征:泌尿生殖医学诊所的全国调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We sought to determine current practice in the diagnosis and management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) in genitourinary medicine departments in the UK, using a detailed questionnaire survey. Evaluable responses were received from 147 (69%) clinics. Seventy-nine (54%) clinics reported seeing >10 new CPPS patients per year. A broad range of investigations was reported to be used in the diagnosis of CPPS. Whilst 89 (61%) clinics reported using the four-glass test in diagnosis, 46 (32%) reported using the test in >90% of patients with CPPS, and 42 (29%) reported never using the test. In the treatment, doxycycline or ciprofloxacin were reported to be first line treatment by 98% clinics, mostly in 4-6 week courses; however, great variation was recorded in second-line choices and use of non-antibiotic approaches. This survey demonstrates that patients with CPPS are regularly diagnosed and managed in genitourinary clinics in the UK, with wide variations in diagnostic and treatment practices.
机译:我们试图通过详细的问卷调查来确定英国泌尿生殖医学部门在慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CPPS)的诊断和管理中的现行做法。从147个诊所(69%)收到了可评估的答复。七十九(54%)个诊所报告说,每年有超过10名新的CPPS患者。据报道,广泛的研究被用于诊断CPPS。尽管有89(61%)的诊所报告使用四孔镜检查进行诊断,但有46(32%)的医生报告说90%以上的CPPS患者使用了该检查方法,有42(29%)的医生从未使用过该检查方法。在该治疗中,据报道98%的诊所将强力霉素或环丙沙星作为一线治疗,主要是在4-6周的疗程中。但是,在二线选择和非抗生素方法的使用中记录了很大的差异。这项调查表明,CPPS患者在英国的泌尿泌尿科诊所得到定期诊断和治疗,诊断和治疗方法差异很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号