...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences >Selection of site-specific regression model for characterization of uniaxial compressive strength of rock
【24h】

Selection of site-specific regression model for characterization of uniaxial compressive strength of rock

机译:表征岩石单轴抗压强度的现场特定回归模型的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When there is no possibility of direct compression test, geotechnical engineers and practitioners may utilize regression models (i.e., equations) to estimate the uniaxial compressive strength, UCS, of rock from point load index, ls((50)), since there are established relationships between the two properties. Different studies have shown, however, that there is no unique equation relating ls((50)) to UCS for all rock types. This leads to the problem of how to select the most appropriate model for a particular rock deposit out of the numerous models available, since UCS of rock like other geomechanical properties are inherently variable as a result of different geological processes that rocks are subjected to This study develops a method that rationally compares different regression models and selects the most appropriate model for a specific site or deposit. The most appropriate model is the model with the highest occurrence probability for the given set of observation data, and it is selected using only a limited number of ls((50)) data obtained from the specific deposit or site. The methodology starts with the formulation of a general likelihood model to determine the occurrence probability of each model based on the limited number of ls((50)) data available from a specific site This is different from previous works that need both UCS and ls((50)) data to draw comparison. Note that UCS data are generally not available when the use or selection of regression model is needed. The selected model is subsequently used in Bayesian framework to integrate the prior knowledge about UCS with the limited number of site-specific ls((50)) data available for probabilistic characterization of UCS, such as obtaining its mean, standard deviation and full probabilistic distribution. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,
机译:当不可能进行直接压缩测试时,岩土工程师和从业人员可以利用回归模型(即方程式)从点荷载指数ls((50))估算岩石的单轴抗压强度UCS,因为已经建立了这两个属性之间的关系。但是,不同的研究表明,对于所有岩石类型,都没有将ls((50))与UCS相关联的唯一方程。这就导致了一个问题,即如何从众多可用模型中为特定的岩石矿床选择最合适的模型,因为岩石的UCS像其他地质力学性质一样,由于岩石经受的不同地质过程而具有内在的可变性。开发一种方法,可以合理地比较不同的回归模型,并为特定的地点或矿床选择最合适的模型。对于给定的一组观测数据,最合适的模型是发生概率最高的模型,并且仅使用从特定矿床或地点获得的有限数量的ls((50))数据进行选择。该方法从制定一般似然模型开始,以基于可从特定站点获得的有限数量的ls((50))数据来确定每个模型的发生概率,这与既需要UCS又需要ls( (50))数据进行比较。请注意,当需要使用或选择回归模型时,UCS数据通常不可用。随后在贝叶斯框架中使用所选模型,以将有关UCS的先验知识与有限数量的可用于UCS概率表征的特定于站点的ls((50))数据相集成,例如获得其均值,标准差和完整概率分布。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号