首页> 外文期刊>American journal of medical quality: the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality >Agreement and Disagreement on Health Care Quality Concepts Among Academic Health Professionals: The Saudi Case
【24h】

Agreement and Disagreement on Health Care Quality Concepts Among Academic Health Professionals: The Saudi Case

机译:学术卫生专业人员之间就卫生保健质量概念达成的协议和不同意见:沙特案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A systematic and rigorous implementation of quality improvement processes is likely to improve the well-being of staff members and heighten their job satisfaction. Assessing professionals' perceptions of health care quality should lead to the betterment of health care services. In Saudi Arabia, no previous studies examine how university health professionals view health care quality concepts. A cross-sectional analytical study employing a self-administered questionnaire with 43 statements assessing quality perceptions of academic health care professionals was used. Despite the agreement of health professionals on numerous quality concepts addressed in this study, there was insufficient agreement on 10 core quality concepts, 3 of which were the following: "quality focuses on customers" (50%), "quality is tangible and therefore measurable" (29.3%), and "quality is data-driven" (62%). Hence, providing health professionals with relevant training likely will generate a better understanding of quality concepts and optimize their performance.
机译:系统和严格执行质量改进流程可能会改善工作人员的生活水平并提高其工作满意度。评估专业人员对医疗保健质量的看法应有助于改善医疗保健服务。在沙特阿拉伯,以前的研究都没有研究大学卫生专业人员如何看待卫生保健质量概念。使用横断面分析研究,该研究采用自我管理的调查表和43项陈述,以评估学术医疗保健专业人员的质量观。尽管卫生专业人员对本研究中涉及的众多质量概念达成了共识,但在10个核心质量概念上并没有达成足够的共识,其中三个是:“质量着眼于客户”(50%),“质量是有形的,因此可衡量的” (29.3%)和“质量是数据驱动的”(62%)。因此,为卫生专业人员提供相关培训可能会更好地理解质量概念并优化其绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号