...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pharmaceutics >In Check Dial: accuracy for Diskus and Turbuhaler.
【24h】

In Check Dial: accuracy for Diskus and Turbuhaler.

机译:在Check Dial中:Diskus和Turbuhaler的准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The In Check Dial was developed to evaluate whether a patient is able to generate an adequate peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through a certain inhalation device. The inhalation profile recorder (IPR) is a calibrated instrument that measures flows through Diskus and Turbuhaler in our research setting. The aim of this study was to compare the PIFs of patients when inhaling through a Diskus or Turbuhaler connected with the IPR (PIF_diskus and PIF_TH) to the flows through the corresponding orifices of the In Check Dial (Diskus_In Check and TH_In Check). METHODS: Twenty-four stable asthma and twenty-one chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients inhaled, on two separate occasions, in randomised order, via the Diskus or Turbuhaler connected with the IPR. Subsequently, patients inhaled through the In Check Dial using the orifices of Diskus or Turbuhaler. RESULTS: The difference between Diskus_In Check and PIF_diskus was 3.9 (11.9)l/min (P=0.038). The difference between TH_In Check and PIF_TH was 3.5 (10.6)l/min (NS). All Diskus- and Turbuhaler-inhalations were performed with the minimum required flow of 30l/min. However, four COPD patients inhaled with the non-optimal flow (<60l/min) through the Turbuhaler. The In Check Dial did not indicate two of them. CONCLUSION: Measuring PIF through Diskus and Turbuhaler using the IPR and the In Check Dial, respectively shows a disagreement of 3.9l/min. A disagreement of 3.5l/min was found for the Turbuhaler. The In Check Dial did not identify two of four patients as 'non-optimal' users.
机译:目的:开发了In Check Dial,以评估患者是否能够通过某种吸入装置产生足够的峰值吸气流量(PIF)。吸入曲线记录器(IPR)是一种经过校准的仪器,可在我们的研究环境中测量通过Diskus和Turbuhaler的流量。这项研究的目的是比较通过与IPR连接的Diskus或Turbuhaler吸入的患者的PIF(PIF_diskus和PIF_TH)与通过检查支票盘相应孔(Diskus_In Check和TH_In Check)的流量。方法:24例稳定哮喘和21例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者随机两次通过与IPR相连的Diskus或Turbuhaler吸入。随后,患者使用Diskus或Turbuhaler的孔通过“检查”刻度盘吸入。结果:Diskus_In Check和PIF_diskus之间的差异为3.9(11.9)l / min(P = 0.038)。 TH_In Check和PIF_TH之间的差异为3.5(10.6)l / min(NS)。所有Diskus和Turbuhaler吸入均以30l / min的最小所需流量进行。但是,有4名COPD患者通过Turbuhaler吸入了非最佳流量(<60l / min)。在检查拨号没有指示其中两个。结论:使用IPR和In Check Dial通过Diskus和Turbuhaler测量PIF时,差异为3.9l / min。涡轮增压器的差异为3.5升/分钟。在检查拨号中没有将四名患者中的两名确定为“非最佳”用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号