首页> 外文期刊>International journal of paleopathology >Cementochronology, to cut or not to cut?
【24h】

Cementochronology, to cut or not to cut?

机译:水泥年代论,要切还是不切?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the continuing problems in paleopathology and paleoepidemiology is an inability to accurately age adult skeletons. Accurate age estimations are critical to the proper evaluation of population health and are necessary in circumventing certain aspects of the osteological paradox. Cementochronology is most likely the only age indicator in anthropology that directly considers a continuously growing tissue and does not require either complex statistical manipulations or the use of a reference population. The major issues and recent advances linked to this technique are reviewed for its successful implementation. This review is a partial outcome of an international research program initiated in 2010 to develop and expand cementochronology. Because cementochronology is a reasonably straightforward histological protocol, it can be implemented in less than 24 h for one tooth at a relatively low cost. The only aspect of cementochronology that requires extensive previous experience is the counting of increments. These unique aspects largely justify the regular implementation of cementochronology in paleoepidemiology and paleopathology in the confident exploration of "population health" issues and demographic inferences. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:古病理学和古流行病学的持续问题之一是无法准确地老化成年骨骼。准确的年龄估算对于正确评估人群健康至关重要,对于规避骨科悖论的某些方面也是必要的。水泥年代学很可能是人类学中唯一直接考虑持续增长的组织且不需要复杂的统计操作或使用参考人群的年龄指标。对于该技术的成功实施,对与该技术相关的主要问题和最新进展进行了回顾。这项审查是一项国际研究计划的部分成果,该计划于2010年启动,目的是发展和扩大胶凝年代学。由于牙合年代学是一种相当简单的组织学方案,因此一颗牙可以在不到24小时内以相对较低的成本实施。胶合年代学唯一需要广泛的先前经验的方面是增量的计数。这些独特的方面在很大程度上证明了在古人类流行病学和古病理学中定期实施胶凝年代学是对“人口健康”问题和人口统计学推断的有信心的探索。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号