首页> 外文期刊>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology >Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions when screening hearing in preschool children in a community setting.
【24h】

Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions when screening hearing in preschool children in a community setting.

机译:当在社区环境中对学龄前儿童进行听力筛查时,比较瞬态诱发的耳声发射和失真产物耳声发射。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The first purpose of this study was to compare transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) with distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) to determine if they resulted in equivalent signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) when used for hearing screening in a preschool population in a community setting. The second purpose was to determine if the OAE methods would result in equivalent pass/refer rates. The third purpose was to determine the agreement between the pass/refer rates from a tympanometric screening and the pass/refer rates from each OAE method. METHODS: Thirty-three preschool children ages 4 months to 4 years, 4 months were tested using DPOAE and TEOAE. The frequencies 800-4000Hz were compared. The tympanometric gradient was obtained from a tympanogram done on each ear. A multivariate statistic was used to compare the emission SNR from both methods. A chi(2) statistic was used to compare the pass/refer rates from both methods. The agreement between the pass/refer rates from the OAE screens and from the tympanometric gradient were compared. RESULTS: TEOAE and DPOAE SNRs were significantly different in the low frequency however, there were no significant differences found in the high frequencies. There were no significant pass/refer differences found between the methods at any frequency. When comparing the agreement between the OAE methods with the tympanometry, both methods produced nearly equivalent agreement with tympanometric gradient. However, the overall correspondence between OAE findings and tympanometry was not perfect. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are effective and especially equivalent in the high frequencies and can be recommended for use in a preschool population in the field. Tympanometric gradient disagreed with both OAE screening results about 25% of the time. Finally, our study also found that higher refer rates can be expected when young (<3 years) preschool children are included in the screen.
机译:目的:本研究的第一个目的是将瞬态诱发性耳声发射(TEOAE)与失真产物耳声发射(DPOAE)进行比较,以确定在学龄前儿童进行听力筛查时,它们是否导致等效的信噪比(SNR)。社区环境中的人口。第二个目的是确定OAE方法是否会导致通过率/参考率相等。第三个目的是确定鼓室筛查的合格/通过率与每种OAE方法的合格/通过率之间的一致性。方法:使用DPOAE和TEOAE对4个月至4岁,4个月的33名学龄前儿童进行了测试。比较了800-4000Hz的频率。从每只耳朵上的鼓室图获得鼓室梯度。使用多元统计量比较两种方法的发射SNR。使用chi(2)统计量比较两种方法的通过/推荐率。比较了来自OAE屏幕和鼓室梯度的通过/参考率之间的一致性。结果:TEOAE和DPOAE SNR在低频下显着不同,但是在高频下没有显着差异。在任何频率下,方法之间都没有发现明显的通过/参考差异。当比较OAE方法与鼓室图法之间的一致性时,这两种方法在鼓室图梯度上产生了几乎相等的一致性。但是,OAE结果与鼓室图之间的总体对应关系并不完美。结论:这两种方法都是有效的,特别是在高频情况下是等效的,可以推荐在该领域的学龄前儿童中使用。大约25%的时间,鼓室梯度与两种OAE筛查结果都不相同。最后,我们的研究还发现,当屏幕中包括年龄小于(3岁)的学龄前儿童时,可以期望更高的推荐率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号