...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics >Measurement Consistency Among Observational Job Analysis Methods During an Intervention Study
【24h】

Measurement Consistency Among Observational Job Analysis Methods During an Intervention Study

机译:干预研究中观察性工作分析方法之间的测量一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Several observational methods are available for ergonomists to evaluate the exposure to musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk factors associated with work. Those methods can be used to evaluate the impact of modifications done at a workstation on the exposure to risk factors. Three methods (QEC, OCRA and 4D Watbak) were used to assess the exposure to MSD risk factors before and after the implementation of changes at a saw and block opening workstation. The results from those 3 methods served to compare the methods and evaluate their consistency. Comparisons among the methods showed positive association between QEC and OCRA indices, and between the QEC back index and 4D Watbak.
机译:人体工程学家可以使用几种观察方法来评估与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)风险因素的暴露。这些方法可用于评估在工作站上进行的修改对风险因素的影响。使用三种方法(QEC,OCRA和4D Watbak)评估在锯锯切机打开工作站实施更改之前和之后暴露于MSD风险因素的程度。这三种方法的结果有助于比较这些方法并评估其一致性。这些方法之间的比较显示,QEC和OCRA指数之间以及QEC反向指数和4D Watbak之间存在正相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号