首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics >Sitting Comfort of Ergonomic Office Chairs - Developed Versus Intuitive Evaluation
【24h】

Sitting Comfort of Ergonomic Office Chairs - Developed Versus Intuitive Evaluation

机译:人体工学办公椅的坐姿舒适性-直观评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The sitting comfort of office chairs with different ergonomic layouts (inferior, superior) was examined. Fifty participants were randomly assigned to a 2 × 5 factorial experimental design with 2 different conditions of ergonomic chair layout (inferior or superior) and 5 different conditions of instruction to explore the chair. Four conditions were created to differentiate between various levels of perceptual awareness and processing of chair-related information (guided exploration and developed evaluation). In a 5th condition, participants remained uninstructed (free exploration and intuitive exploration). Under guided exploration, the participants' perception of sitting comfort was in line with objective differences in the chair layout. Different conditions of guided exploration, however, did not influence the evaluations. Under free exploration, the participants' perceptions did not match the ergonomic chair layout. In contrast to participants under guided exploration, they even rated the economically inferior office chair more favourably than the economically superior chair.
机译:检查了具有不同人体工程学布局(低级,高级)的办公椅的舒适度。 50名参与者被随机分配到2×5阶乘实验设计中,该设计具有2种不同的人体工学座椅布局条件(劣等或劣等)和5种不同的指导椅子探索条件。创建了四个条件,以区分不同级别的感知意识和与椅子相关的信息的处理(指导性探索和完善的评估)。在第5个条件下,参与者仍然不受指导(免费探索和直观探索)。在有指导的探索下,参与者对坐着舒适度的感觉与椅子布局的客观差异是一致的。但是,不同的指导勘探条件不会影响评估。在自由探索下,参与者的感知与人体工学椅子的布局不符。与在指导下进行探索的参与者相反,他们甚至将经济低劣的办公椅评为比经济优越的办公椅。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号