首页> 外文期刊>International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health. >The variability of bacterial aerosol in poultry houses depending on selected factors
【24h】

The variability of bacterial aerosol in poultry houses depending on selected factors

机译:禽舍中细菌气溶胶的变异性取决于所选因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study is aimed at evaluation of bacterial air contamination in intensive poultry breeding. The evaluation was based on the determined levels of bacterial concentrations and qualitative identification of isolated microorganisms. Materials and Methods: The study covered 5 poultry houses: two hatcheries and three hen houses with the litter bed system. The air was sampled in three measurement series in the central part of the investigated workplace at the height of about 1.5 m over the ground, using portable measuring sets consisting of a GilAir 5 (Sensidyne, USA) pump and a measuring head filled with a glass microfibre filter (Whatman, UK). For the quantitative and qualitative analysis of microorganisms were used appropriate microbiological media. Results: The total concentrations of airborne mesophilic bacteria inside the poultry breeding houses ranged from 4.74×104 cfu/m3 to 1.89×108 cfu/m3. For Gram-negative bacteria, the range comprised the values from 4.33×102 cfu/m3 to 4.29×106 cfu/m3. The concentrations of the cocci of Enterococcus genus ranged from 1.53×104 cfu/m3 to 1.09×107 cfu/m3, whereas those of other Gram-positive bacteria from 3.78×104 cfu/m3 to 6.65×107 cfu/m3. The lowest concentrations of each group of the examined microorganisms were noted in the second measurement series when the air exchange in the breeding houses was over twice higher than in first and third measurement series because the mechanical ventilation was supported by natural ventilation (opened gates in the buildings). The lowest concentrations of total bacteria were obtained in those buildings where one-day old chickens were kept. Gram-positive bacteria of the genera: Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Corynebacterium, Brevibacterium, Micrococcus, Cellulomonas, Bacillus, Aerococcus, and Gram-negative bacteria of the genera: Pseudomonas, Moraxella, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Pasteurella, Pantoea were isolated. It was shown that for most of the investigated livestock premises the total bacteria concentrations exceeded the reference value of 1.0×105 cfu/m3. Furthermore, pathogenic microorganisms which are a potential threat to human health (Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae ssp. ozaenae, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium) were found among the identified bacteria. Conclusions: The results indicate that the hygienic conditions of the working environment connected with litter bed system production of poultry are affected by changes of the efficiency of ventilation and create a direct health risk to employees. They should use personal protective measures to protect their respiratory tract, especially when the gates in the hen houses are closed.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估集约化家禽繁殖中的细菌空气污染。评估基于确定的细菌浓度水平和定性鉴定的分离微生物。材料和方法:该研究涵盖了5家禽舍:两间孵化场和三间带有垫料床系统的母鸡舍。使用便携式测量装置(包括GilAir 5(美国,Sensidyne,美国))和装有玻璃的测量头,在被调查工作场所的中央部分,以离地面约1.5 m的高度,以三个测量系列对空气进行采样。超细纤维过滤器(英国Whatman)。为了对微生物进行定量和定性分析,使用了适当的微生物培养基。结果:家禽繁殖室内的空气传播中温细菌的总浓度为4.74×104 cfu / m3至1.89×108 cfu / m3。对于革兰氏阴性细菌,范围包括从4.33×102 cfu / m3到4.29×106 cfu / m3的值。肠球菌属球菌的浓度范围为1.53×104 cfu / m3至1.09×107 cfu / m3,而其他革兰氏阳性菌的浓度为3.78×104 cfu / m3至6.65×107 cfu / m3。在第二个测量系列中,当种房中的空气交换量比第一个和第三个测量系列中的空气交换高出两倍以上时,在第二个测量系列中记录到每组被检查微生物的最低浓度,因为机械通风是通过自然通风来支撑的(建筑物)。在那些饲养了一天大鸡的建筑物中,细菌总数最低。革兰氏阳性菌属有:葡萄球菌,肠球菌,棒杆菌,短杆菌,微球菌,纤维单胞菌,芽孢杆菌,气球菌和革兰氏阴性菌属有:假单胞菌,莫拉氏菌,大肠埃希氏菌,肠杆菌,克雷伯菌,巴斯德氏菌,泛菌。结果表明,对于大多数调查的牲畜饲养场,细菌总数均超过了参考值1.0×105 cfu / m3。此外,在鉴定出的细菌中,发现了对人体健康有潜在威胁的病原微生物(大肠杆菌,阴沟肠杆菌,肺炎克雷伯菌,粪肠球菌,粪肠球菌,粪肠球菌)。结论:结果表明,与家禽垫料床系统生产相关的工作环境的卫生条件受通风效率变化的影响,并直接威胁员工健康。他们应采取个人保护措施来保护自己的呼吸道,尤其是在鸡舍的门关闭时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号