首页> 外文期刊>International journal of modern physics, D. Gravitation, astrophysics, cosmology >The status of modern five-dimensional gravity (A short review: Why physics needs the fifth dimension)
【24h】

The status of modern five-dimensional gravity (A short review: Why physics needs the fifth dimension)

机译:现代五维引力的现状(简短回顾:物理学为何需要第五维)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent criticism of higher-dimensional extensions of Einstein's theory is considered. This may have some justification in regard to string theory, but is misguided as applied to five-dimensional (5D) theories with a large extra dimension. Such theories smoothly embed general relativity, ensuring recovery of the latter's observational support. When the embedding of spacetime is carried out in accordance with Campbell's theorem, the resulting 5D theory naturally explains the origin of classical matter and vacuum energy. Also, constraints on the equations of motion near a high-energy surface or membrane in the 5D manifold lead to quantization and quantum uncertainty. These are major returns on the modest investment of one extra dimension. Instead of fruitless bickering about whether it is possible to "see" the fifth dimension, it is suggested that it be treated on par with other concepts of physics, such as time. The main criterion for the acceptance of a fifth dimension (or not) should be its usefulness.
机译:考虑到最近对爱因斯坦理论的高维扩展的批评。关于弦理论,这可能有一定道理,但由于将其应用于具有较大额外维度的五维(5D)理论而被误导了。这样的理论顺利地嵌入了广义相对论,确保了后者的观测支持的恢复。当按照坎贝尔定理进行时空嵌入时,所得的5D理论自然可以解释经典物质和真空能的起源。同样,对5D歧管中高能表面或膜附近的运动方程的约束也会导致量化和量子不确定性。这些是一维额外投资的主要回报。建议不要将其与其他物理概念(例如时间)同等对待,而不是对是否可能“看到”第五维度进行无休止的争论。接受(或不接受)第五维的主要标准应该是其实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号