首页> 外文期刊>International journal of occupational and environmental health : >Manipulated data in Shell's Benzene Historical Exposure Study.
【24h】

Manipulated data in Shell's Benzene Historical Exposure Study.

机译:壳牌公司《苯历史暴露研究》中的处理数据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1983, in the face of mounting evidence of excess leukemia among workers at Shell Oil's Wood River (IL) and Deer Park (TX) petroleum refineries, Shell initiated the Benzene Historical Exposure Study (BHES). Shell's prior research had implicated occupational exposure to benzene as the source of the excess leukemia. The BHES report submission, which ultimately found no link between exposure and the excess morbidity, coincided with OSHA's planned hearings over a new regulatory standard for benzene. Over the next two decades, Shell published several papers based on or expanding the BHES data, all of which concluded that the excess of leukemia was unrelated to benzene. A review of the raw data on which Shell and its consultants relied reveals that Shell manipulated and omitted data in order to reach conclusions that exculpated it from liability and helped delay stricter benzene regulation.
机译:1983年,面对越来越多的壳牌石油公司伍德河(IL)和鹿园(TX)炼油厂工人过度白血病的证据,壳牌公司发起了苯历史暴露研究(BHES)。壳牌公司先前的研究表明,职业性接触苯是过量白血病的来源。 BHES提交的报告最终没有发现暴露与过量发病之间的联系,这与OSHA计划就苯的新监管标准进行听证会相吻合。在接下来的二十年中,壳牌根据或扩展了BHES数据发表了几篇论文,所有这些结论都表明,过量的白血病与苯无关。壳牌及其顾问所依据的原始数据的审查显示,壳牌操纵和省略了数据,以便得出得出的结论,这些结论使该公司免于承担责任,并有助于延迟更严格的苯法规。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号