首页> 外文期刊>International journal of occupational and environmental health : >Comparison of N95 disposable filtering facepiece fits using bitrex qualitative and TSI Portacount quantitative fit testing.
【24h】

Comparison of N95 disposable filtering facepiece fits using bitrex qualitative and TSI Portacount quantitative fit testing.

机译:使用bitrex定性和TSI Portacount定量拟合测试比较N95一次性过滤式面罩的拟合。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As a means of evaluating the use of denatonium benzoate (bitrex) as a qualitative fit test agent with filtering facepiece respirators, the bitrex qualitative and TSI Protacount(R) quantitative fit-test methods were compared using N95 filtering facepieces. Seventy-nine paired tests (trial) were performed. Detection of bitrex during a qualitative fit test or measurement of a fit factor of <100 during a quantitative fit test constituted a failure. Qualitative and quantitative methods were performed using identical test protocols. Data were analyzed using pass/fail criteria, and matched-pair analysis methods were applied. The results of this study indicate that the use of bitrex during qualitative fit testing of N95 disposable filtering facepieces results in an increase in failure and/or rejection in cases where a TSI Portacount (plus N95 companion accessory) quantitatively establishes an acceptable fit.
机译:作为评估使用苯甲酸地那铵(bitrex)作为带过滤口罩的定性贴合测试剂的一种方法,使用N95过滤面罩对bitrex定性和TSI Protacount?定量拟合测试方法进行了比较。进行了79项配对测试(试验)。在定性拟合测试期间检测到bitrex或在定量拟合测试期间测量<100的拟合因子构成失败。使用相同的测试方案进行定性和定量方法。使用通过/失败标准分析数据,并应用配对分析方法。这项研究的结果表明,在TSI Portacount(加上N95配套附件)定量建立可接受的配合的情况下,在N95一次性过滤面罩的定性配合测试中使用bitrex会导致失败和/或拒绝的增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号