首页> 外文期刊>International journal of occupational and environmental health : >Why countries ban asbestos: The roots of political will
【24h】

Why countries ban asbestos: The roots of political will

机译:国家为何禁止石棉:政治意愿的根源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Banning asbestos is not just a good thing. It's the right thing. Arthur Frank raised some excellent points about the importance of "political will" for banning asbestos, and gave valuable comments on our article "Why some, but not all, countries have banned asbestos." We agree that what matters in the end will be "political will." When we speak of changes in social policies, politics matters. However, there are several shortcomings if we treat "political will" as the only matter. First, "political will" will not be formed spontaneously. Nor does it present itself everywhere needed. Especially for those countries where the political will to ban is not present, we have to think about the underlying cause for its absence, and how we can intervene to generate it. As for Canada, we knew that policy there should have changed much earlier, due to various differences from other nations without bans. The main focus of our study was the question, "what were the differences of countries with the political will to ban from the no-ban countries".
机译:禁止石棉不仅仅是一件好事。这是对的。亚瑟·弗兰克(Arthur Frank)提出了关于“政治意愿”对禁止石棉的重要性的一些观点,并对我们的文章“为什么某些国家(但不是全部)国家禁止石棉”发表了宝贵的意见。我们同意,最终重要的是“政治意愿”。当我们谈到社会政策的变化时,政治很重要。但是,如果我们将“政治意愿”作为唯一问题,则存在几个缺点。首先,“政治意愿”不会自发形成。它也不会出现在需要的任何地方。尤其是对于那些不存在禁止政治意愿的国家,我们必须考虑其缺乏的根本原因,以及我们如何进行干预以产生这种禁令。至于加拿大,我们知道那里的政策应该早得多改变,因为与其他国家没有禁令的各种分歧。我们研究的主要重点是以下问题:“有政治意愿禁止无禁运国家的国家之间有什么区别”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号