...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Comments on a paper by D J Brenner (Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3).
【24h】

Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Comments on a paper by D J Brenner (Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3).

机译:有效剂量:一个有缺陷的概念,可以并且应该被取代。评论D J Brenner(Br J Radiol 2008; 81:521-3)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Editor-Sir,The author is uncompromising in his criticisms of the quantity "effective dose" and proposes its replacement with a quantity termed "effective risk". The uninformed use and misapplication of effective dose is a recognised problem [1-4]. However, used as intended within the protection system recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) [1, 5], it provides a risk-related quantity for the control of exposures and the optimisation of protection. In response to the article by Brenner [6], we would like to take the opportunity to explain the purpose of effective dose and answer some specific criticisms. We agree with Brenner to the extent that an alternative approach is required in situations for which effective dose was not intended, but conclude that risk calculations should be made for clearly defined purposes, not to provide a general replacement scheme.
机译:主席先生,作者对“有效剂量”数量的批评毫不妥协,并建议用“有效风险”数量代替。有效剂量的不知情使用和误用是公认的问题[1-4]。但是,它在国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)[1,5]建议的防护系统中按预期用途使用,它提供了与风险有关的量,用于控制照射和优化防护。在回应Brenner [6]的文章时,我们想借此机会解释有效剂量的目的并回答一些具体的批评。我们在不打算使用有效剂量的情况下需要采用替代方法的情况下与Brenner达成了共识,但得出的结论是,应出于明确定义的目的进行风险计算,而不是提供一般的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号