首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Comparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programme
【24h】

Comparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programme

机译:乳腺癌筛查程序中三种数字乳腺X线摄影系统的临床性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares the clinical performance of three digital mammography system types in a breast cancer screening programme. 28 digital mammography systems from three different vendors were included in the study. The retrospective analysis included 238 182 screening examinations of females aged between 50 and 64 years over a 3-year period. All images were double read and assigned a result according to a 5-point rating scale to indicate the probability of cancer. Females with a positive result were recalled for further assessment imaging and biopsy if necessary. Clinical performance in terms of cancer detection rate was analysed and the results presented. No statistically significant difference was found between the three different mammography systems in a population-based screening programme, in terms of the overall cancer detection rate or in the detection of invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. This was shown in both prevalent and subsequent screening examination categories. The results demonstrate comparable cancer detection performance for the three imaging system types operational in the screening programme.
机译:这项研究比较了三种数字乳腺摄影系统在乳腺癌筛查计划中的临床表现。来自三个不同供应商的28个数字乳房X线照相系统被纳入研究。回顾性分析包括3年内对年龄在50至64岁之间的女性进行的238 182次筛查检查。重复读取所有图像,并根据5分制评分标准指定结果以指示癌症的可能性。如果有必要,召回结果为阳性的女性进行进一步评估成像和活检。分析了癌症检出率的临床表现并提出了结果。就总体癌症检出率或浸润性癌和导管癌的原位检测而言,在基于人群的筛查计划中,三种不同的乳腺X线摄影系统之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。这在流行筛查检查和随后的筛查检查类别中均显示。结果表明,在筛选程序中可操作的三种成像系统类型的癌症检测性能相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号