...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >A 2-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels the BELLO study
【24h】

A 2-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels the BELLO study

机译:一项为期2年的随机多中心研究的随访结果,比较了紫杉醇药物洗脱球囊和紫杉醇洗脱支架在小型冠状动脉血管中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background/objectives: A prospective, multi-center, randomized trial, BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization), showed that the primary endpoint of in-stent (in-balloon) late loss was significantly less with drug-eluting balloons (DEB) as compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). At 6 months, DEB and PES were associated with similar rates of angiographic restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization. The aim of this study was to report 2-year clinical outcomes after treatment of de novo small vessel disease with DEB as compared with PES.
机译:背景/目的:一项前瞻性,多中心,随机试验BELLO(气囊洗脱和晚期丢失优化)显示,支架内(气囊)晚期丢失的主要终点显着低于药物洗脱球囊(DEB) )与紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)相比。在6个月时,DEB和PES与相似的血管造影再狭窄率,目标病变血运重建(TLR)和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)定义为死亡,心肌梗塞和目标血管血运重建。这项研究的目的是报告与PES相比,用DEB治疗新生小血管疾病后2年的临床结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号