首页> 外文期刊>International journal of geriatric psychiatry >The value of the clock drawing test and the mini-mental state examination for identifying vascular cognitive impairment no dementia.
【24h】

The value of the clock drawing test and the mini-mental state examination for identifying vascular cognitive impairment no dementia.

机译:钟表绘画测试和微心理状态检查对识别血管性认知障碍无痴呆的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) respectively or in combination for differentiating Vascular Cognitive Impairment No Dementia (V-CIND) from normal subjects. METHODS: Eighty V-CIND patients and 80 healthy control subjects were blindly evaluated with MMSE, CDT, and additional neuropsychological tests. CDT was scored according to the Rouleau method and AD Cooperative Study method. Sensitivities and specificities of the two CDT measures and MMSE for identifying V-CIND patients were determined. The Areas Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUCs) were compared, and the sensitivity of the combination of CDT with MMSE calculated. RESULTS: V-CIND group performed worse than controls on both MMSE (p < 0.0001) and the two CDTs (p < 0.0001). In differentiating V-CIND patients from normal subjects, the two CDT measures provided sensitivities of 68.7% and 65.0%, and specificities of 78.7% and 86.2% respectively at optimal cutoff scores, which did no better than MMSE (sensitivity 80%, specificity 70%) (comparison of the AUCs, p = 0.992 and 0.428). The sensitivity of MMSE was marginally higher than that of CDT scored with AD Cooperative Study method (p = 0.053). By combining the two CDT measures with MMSE, the sensitivity was improved to 93.7% and 92.5% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with MMSE, CDT is of only similar or even weaker ability for identifying V-CIND. MMSE at a cutoff of 28 may be of some value in detecting V-CIND patients. CDT and MMSE in combination provide a valid instrument for V-CIND screening.
机译:目的:分别确定钟表绘画测试(CDT)和小精神状态检查(MMSE)或组合使用以区分正常人的血管性认知障碍无痴呆症(V-CIND)的有效性。方法:MMSE,CDT和其他神经心理学测试盲目评估了80名V-CIND患者和80名健康对照组。根据Rouleau方法和AD合作研究方法对CDT进行评分。确定了两种CDT措施和MMSE识别V-CIND患者的敏感性和特异性。比较了接收器工作特性曲线下的面积(AUC),并计算了CDT与MMSE组合的灵敏度。结果:V-CIND组在MMSE(p <0.0001)和两个CDT(p <0.0001)上的表现均较对照组差。在将V-CIND患者与正常受试者区分开的情况下,两种CDT措施在最佳截止评分下的敏感性分别为68.7%和65.0%,特异性分别为78.7%和86.2%,这并不比MMSE好(敏感性80%,特异性70 %)(AUC的比较,p = 0.992和0.428)。 MMSE的敏感性略高于采用AD合作研究方法评分的CDT(p = 0.053)。通过将两种CDT措施与MMSE相结合,灵敏度分别提高到了93.7%和92.5%。结论:与MMSE相比,CDT识别V-CIND的能力仅相似甚至更弱。截断值为28的MMSE对检测V-CIND患者可能具有一定价值。 CDT和MMSE的结合提供了一种有效的V-CIND筛查工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号