...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics >Determination of reference values of apparent mass responses of seated occupants of different body masses under vertical vibration with and without a back support
【24h】

Determination of reference values of apparent mass responses of seated occupants of different body masses under vertical vibration with and without a back support

机译:带有和不带有靠背支撑的垂直振动下不同体重的乘坐者的表观质量响应的参考值的确定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The biodynamic response of human body seated without a back support and exposed to vertical whole-body vibration have been standardized in ISO 5982 and DIN 45676 in terms of driving-point mechanical impedance and apparent mass. A comparison of ranges defined in two standards, however, reveal considerable differences in both the magnitude and phase. Greater differences are more evident for the three body mass groups, which suggests the lack of adequate reference values of biodynamic responses of seated human subjects of different body masses. In this experimental study, the biodynamic responses of seated humans within three different body mass ranges are characterized under different magnitudes of vibration and three different sitting postures in an attempt to define reference values of apparent mass for applications in mechanical-equivalent model development and anthropodynamic manikin design. Laboratory measurements were performed with adult male subjects of total body mass in the vicinity of 55, 75 and 98 kg (nine subjects for each mass group) seated with and without an inclined back support and exposed to three different magnitudes of white-noise vertical vibration (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s{sup}2 unweighted rms acceleration) in the frequency range between 0.5 and 20 Hz. The measured data were analyzed to derive the mean magnitude and phase responses for the three body masses, posture and excitation conditions. The mean magnitude responses of subjects within three mass groups were compared with idealized ranges defined in ISO 5982 and mean values described in DIN 45676 for no back support condition. The results revealed significant differences between the mean measured and standardized magnitudes, suggesting that the current standardized values do not describe the biodynamic responses of seated occupant of different masses even for the back not supported condition. The mean measured responses revealed most important effect of body mass, irrespective of the sitting posture. The reference values of apparent mass responses of seated body subject to vertical whole-body vibration are thus defined for three mass groups and different back support conditions that may be considered applicable for ranges of excitations considered. The responses of the body seated without a back support, also revealed notable influences of excitation magnitude, particularly on the primary peak frequencies.
机译:ISO 5982和DIN 45676已在驱动点机械阻抗和表观质量方面标准化了没有靠背坐下并暴露于垂直全身振动的人体生物力学响应。但是,通过比较两个标准中定义的范围,可以发现幅度和相位都存在很大差异。对于三个体重组,更大的差异更加明显,这表明缺乏对不同体重的就座人类受试者的生物动力反应的适当参考值。在本实验研究中,在三种不同体重范围内的坐着的人的生物动力响应在不同的振动幅度和三种不同的坐姿下进行表征,以试图为机械等效模型开发和人体动力学人体模型中的应用定义表观质量的参考值设计。实验室测量是在体重分别为55、75和98公斤的成年男性受试者(每个质量组有9名受试者)的情况下进行的,他们坐着并没有倾斜的背部支撑,并受到三种不同大小的白噪声垂直振动的影响(0.5、1.0和2.0 m / s {sup} 2非加权均方根加速度)在0.5和20 Hz之间的频率范围内。分析测得的数据以得出三种体重,姿势和激发条件的平均幅度和相位响应。将三个质量组内受试者的平均幅度响应与ISO 5982中定义的理想范围和DIN 45676中描述的无背支撑条件下的平均值进行比较。结果显示平均测量值和标准化量值之间存在显着差异,表明当前的标准化值不能描述就座后座的乘员的生物动力响应,即使在没有背部支撑的情况下也是如此。无论坐姿如何,平均测得的反应均显示出体重最重要的影响。因此,为三个质量组和不同的后支撑条件定义了就座人体在垂直全身振动作用下的表观质量响应的参考值,这些条件可能被认为适用于所考虑的激励范围。没有靠背支撑的人体反应也显示出激发幅度的显着影响,特别是对初级峰值频率的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号