首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Comparison of retinal thickness measurements and segmentation performance of four different spectral and time domain OCT devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
【24h】

Comparison of retinal thickness measurements and segmentation performance of four different spectral and time domain OCT devices in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

机译:在新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性中四种不同光谱和时域OCT装置的视网膜厚度测量和分割性能的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: To evaluate the reliability of different optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and scanning patterns in the assessment of retinal thickness and segmentation performance in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: 28 eyes with nAMD and 10 healthy eyes were imaged using conventional time domain (TD) OCT as well as three spectral-domain (SD) OCT systems. Radial scans of 6 mm in size were compared between Stratus and Topcon OCT, in addition to raster scans of all three SD-OCT devices. Retinal thickness values were analysed. RESULTS: Spectralis SD-OCT demonstrated the highest values of all OCT devices in central millimetre thickness (CMMT), and Topcon OCT raster scans showed the lowest values. Significant correlations could be found between the CMMT measurements of Cirrus and Spectralis OCT (r = 0.87). Analyses showed best segmentation for Cirrus and Spectralis SD-OCTs. Cirrus 200x200x1024 scans showed 4% and Stratus OCT 38% moderate or severe segmentation errors. CONCLUSION: Retinal thickness values were generally higher in SD-OCT analysis. Different performances of automatic retinal thickness analysis indicate the potential of different software algorithms to quantify retinal morphology in nAMD. Further development of current algorithms may improve quantification of retinal thickness detection in the future even further.
机译:目的:在评估新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的视网膜厚度和分割性能时,评估不同光学相干断层扫描(OCT)设备和扫描模式的可靠性。方法:使用常规时域(TD)OCT以及三个光谱域(SD)OCT系统对28只nAMD眼和10只健康眼进行成像。除了对所有三个SD-OCT设备进行光栅扫描外,还比较了Stratus和Topcon OCT之间6mm的径向扫描。分析视网膜厚度值。结果:Spectralis SD-OCT以中心毫米厚度(CMMT)展示了所有OCT设备的最高值,而Topcon OCT光栅扫描显示出了最低值。在Cirrus和Spectralis OCT的CMMT测量之间可以找到显着的相关性(r = 0.87)。分析显示,Cirrus和Spectralis SD-OCT的分割效果最佳。 Cirrus 200x200x1024扫描显示4%,Stratus OCT 38%的中度或严重分割错误。结论:在SD-OCT分析中,视网膜厚度值通常较高。自动视网膜厚度分析的不同性能表明不同软件算法在nAMD中量化视网膜形态的潜力。当前算法的进一步发展可能在将来甚至进一步改善视网膜厚度检测的量化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号